...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Above- or below-elbow casts for distal third forearm fractures in children? An updated meta-analysis of the literature
【24h】

Above- or below-elbow casts for distal third forearm fractures in children? An updated meta-analysis of the literature

机译:上肘或下肘石膏可治疗儿童第三前臂远端骨折?文献的最新荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In August 2011 we published a meta-analysis entitled "Above- or below-elbow casts for distal third forearm fractures in children? A meta-analysis of the literature" in your journal Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery [1]. In this article we conclude that below-elbow cast (BEC) is not inferior to above-elbow cast (AEC) so that this is a valid treatment option for distal third forearm fractures in children. Since the publication of this article, two new trials [2, 3] have been published on this topic, therefore justifying an update of this meta-analysis. Unfortunately, the large trial of Rahman and colleagues did mainly report on radiological outcome measures. In our primary meta-analysis, we stated that there were some limitations to our study; for example, the small number of patients that could be included. By including these two trials we could add 174 (108 (3) + 66 (2)) to the 300 already included patients.
机译:2011年8月,我们在您的骨科和创伤外科杂志[1]中发表了题为“儿童上前臂远端第三骨折的肘部铸件以下或肘部铸件?文献的荟萃分析”的荟萃分析。在本文中,我们得出结论,肘下石膏(BEC)不逊于肘上石膏(AEC),因此这是治疗儿童前臂远端第三骨折的有效选择。自从本文发表以来,已经有两个关于该主题的新试验[2,3],因此有必要对此荟萃分析进行更新。不幸的是,拉赫曼及其同事的大型试验确实报告了放射学结果指标。在我们的主要荟萃分析中,我们说我们的研究存在一些局限性。例如,可以包括的患者数量很少。通过包括这两项试验,我们可以将300名已经纳入研究的患者增加174名(108(3)+ 66(2))。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号