...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Computer-Adaptive Balance Testing Improves Discrimination Between Community-Dwelling Elderly Fallers and Nonfallers
【24h】

Computer-Adaptive Balance Testing Improves Discrimination Between Community-Dwelling Elderly Fallers and Nonfallers

机译:计算机自适应平衡测试改善了社区居民中老年人和非老年人的区分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To build an item response theory—based computer adaptive test (CAT) for balance from 3 traditional, fixed-form balance measures: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), and dynamic gait index (DGI); and to examine whether the CAT's psychometric performance exceeded that of individual measures. Design: Secondary analysis combining 2 existing datasets. Setting: Community based. Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (N=187) who were aged >65 years (mean age, 75.2±6.8y, 69% women). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The BBS, POMA, and DGI items were compiled into an initial 38-item bank. The Rasch partial credit model was used for final item bank calibration. CAT simulations were conducted to identify the ideal CAT. CAT score accuracy, reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and validity were examined. Floor and ceiling effects and validity of the CAT and individual measures were compared. Results: A 23-item bank met model expectations. A 10-item CAT was selected, showing a very strong association with full item bank scores (r= .97) and good overall reliability (.78). Reliability was better in low- to midbalance ranges as a result of better item targeting to balance ability when compared with the highest balance ranges. No floor effect was noted. The CAT ceiling effect (11.2%) was significantly lower than the POMA (40.1%) and DGI (40.3%) ceiling effects (P<.001 per comparison). The CAT outperformed individual measures, being the only test to discriminate between fallers and nonfallers (P=.007), and being the strongest predictor of self-reported function. Conclusions: The balance CAT showed excellent accuracy, good overall reliability, and excellent validity compared with individual measures, being the only measure to discriminate between fallers and nonfallers. Prospective examination, particularly in low-functioning older adults and clinical populations with balance deficits, is recommended. Development of an improved CAT based on an expanded item bank containing higher difficulty items is also recommended.
机译:目标:建立基于项目响应理论的计算机自适应测试(CAT),以平衡3种传统的固定形式的平衡度量:伯格平衡量表(BBS),绩效导向的移动性评估(POMA)和动态步态指数(DGI) );并检查CAT的心理测评成绩是否超过了个别测验。设计:二级分析结合了两个现有数据集。地点:基于社区。参加者:年龄> 65岁(平均年龄,75.2±6.8y,69%的女性)的社区居住老年人(N = 187)。干预措施:不适用。主要成果衡量指标:BBS,POMA和DGI项目被汇总到最初的38个项目库中。 Rasch部分信用模型用于最终项目库校准。进行了CAT模拟以识别理想的CAT。检查了CAT评分的准确性,可靠性,地板和天花板效果以及有效性。比较了地板和天花板的影响以及CAT的有效性和个别措施。结果:一家有23个项目的银行达到了模型预期。选择了10个项目的CAT,显示出与完整项目库得分(r = .97)和良好的整体可靠性(.78)的紧密关联。与较高的平衡范围相比,由于在平衡能力上更好地定位了物料,因此在中低平衡范围内的可靠性更好。没有发现地板效应。 CAT上限效应(11.2%)显着低于POMA(40.1%)和DGI(40.3%)上限效应(每次比较P <.001)。 CAT优于单独的衡量标准,它是区分掉队者和不掉队者的唯一测试(P = .007),并且是自我报告功能的最强预测指标。结论:与单独的措施相比,天平CAT具有极好的准确性,良好的整体可靠性和出色的有效性,是区分跌倒者和非跌倒者的唯一措施。建议进行前瞻性检查,尤其是在低功能的成年人和有平衡缺陷的临床人群中。还建议根据包含较高难度项目的扩展项目库开发改进的CAT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号