首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Effect of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: A double-blind, sham-controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: A double-blind, sham-controlled trial

机译:高频和低频重复经颅磁刺激对急性卒中患者视觉空间疏忽的影响:一项双盲,假对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in patients with acute stroke with visuospatial neglect. Design: This study was a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Data are presented from 27 patients (15 men, 12 women; mean age, 67.0y) randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of low-frequency (1Hz) rTMS over the nonlesioned PPC, high-frequency (10Hz) rTMS over the lesioned PPC, or sham stimulation. Setting: National university hospital. Participants: Patients (N=27) diagnosed with visuospatial neglect after stroke. Intervention: Ten sessions of rTMS over a 2-week period. Main Outcome Measures: The severity of visuospatial neglect was assessed pre- and posttreatment using the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, line bisection test, star cancellation test, and Catherine Bergego Scale. Results: When comparing the differences in the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, line bisection test, star cancellation test, Catherine Bergego Scale, and Korean-Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) scores before and after treatment according to group, we found that changes in the line bisection test and K-MBI scores were significantly different between 3 groups. In the post hoc analysis, the improvement in the line bisection test score in the high-frequency rTMS group was statistically significant compared with that in the sham stimulation group (high vs sham P=.03, low vs sham P=.09, high vs low P=.58), and the improvements in the K-MBI scores of the 2 rTMS groups were statistically significant compared with those in the sham stimulation group (high vs sham P<.01, low vs sham P=.02, high vs low P=.75). Conclusions: These results indicate that high-frequency rTMS is effective in the treatment of visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke.
机译:目的:比较低频和高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对后顶叶皮层(PPC)的治疗,对急性卒中伴视觉空间疏忽患者具有治疗作用。设计:本研究是一项前瞻性,双盲,假对照试验。数据来自27位患者(15位男性,12位女性;平均年龄67.0y),这些患者被随机分配为在非病变PPC上接受10次低频(1Hz)rTMS,在病变PPC上接受高频(10Hz)rTMS,或假刺激。地点:国立大学医院。参与者:中风后被诊断为视空间疏忽的患者(N = 27)。干预:在2周的时间内进行10次rTMS。主要结果指标:使用无运动视觉感知测试,线二等分测试,恒星消除测试和凯瑟琳·贝格戈量表(Catherine Bergego Scale)评估治疗前后的视觉空间疏忽的严重程度。结果:在比较按组进行治疗前后的无运动视觉知觉测试,线二等分测试,恒星消除测试,凯瑟琳·贝格戈量表和韩国改良的Barthel指数(K-MBI)得分的差异时,我们发现3组之间线平分测验的变化和K-MBI得分显着不同。在事后分析中,与假刺激组相比,高频rTMS组线对分测验分数的改善具有统计学显着性(高vs假P = .03,低vs假P = .09,高对比低P = .58),并且与假刺激组相比,两个rTMS组的K-MBI得分的改善具有统计学意义(高vs假P <.01,低vs假P = .02,高与低P = .75)。结论:这些结果表明,高频rTMS可有效治疗急性卒中患者的视空间疏忽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号