首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >A systematic literature review of drug therapies for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: Current evidence and meta-analysis informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis
【24h】

A systematic literature review of drug therapies for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: Current evidence and meta-analysis informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis

机译:有关银屑病关节炎药物治疗的系统文献综述:现有证据和荟萃分析为EULAR推荐治疗银屑病关节炎提供了建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To review the available evidence for the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and biological drug therapies for the different clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in order to provide data for the development of treatment recommendations by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) taskforce. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) of available treatments for PsA was performed using the largest electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE) by two working groups formed within the EULAR taskforce. This comprised a comprehensive sample of rheumatologists, dermatologists, epidemiologists and patients. The available evidence was reviewed for NSAIDs, synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), local and systemic corticosteroids and biologic drugs. All articles and abstracts published between 1962 and January 2010 were reviewed and considered and a meta-analysis of data on biological therapies was performed. Results: While little data are available on NSAIDs, glucocorticoids and synthetic DMARDs, the available evidence suggests an acceptable efficacy and safety profile of both NSAIDs and synthetic DMARDs (methotrexate, cyclosporine A, sulfasalazine and leflunomide) in PsA. More evidence is available (level 1B) supporting the efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab) in treating the signs and symptoms of PsA as well as reducing radiographic progression. Registry data show no new safety concerns, although the numbers studied to date are relatively small. Conclusions: This SLR reveals some evidence to support the use of NSAIDs and synthetic DMARDs and good evidence for the efficacy of anti-TNF therapy in PsA.
机译:目的:审查有关非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),针对银屑病关节炎(PsA)不同临床表现的合成和生物药物疗法的有效性和安全性的现有证据,以便为治疗的发展提供数据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)工作组的建议。方法:由EULAR工作组内的两个工作组使用最大的电子数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE和COCHRANE)对PsA的可用治疗方法进行了系统的文献综述(SLR)。这包括风湿病学家,皮肤病学家,流行病学家和患者的全面样本。审查了有关NSAIDs,合成抗风湿药(DMARDs),局部和全身性皮质类固醇以及生物药物的可用证据。审查并考虑了1962年至2010年1月之间发表的所有文章和摘要,并对生物疗法的数据进行了荟萃分析。结果:虽然关于NSAID,糖皮质激素和合成DMARD的数据很少,但现有证据表明NSAID和合成DMARD(甲氨蝶呤,环孢素A,柳氮磺吡啶和来氟米特)在PsA中的疗效和安全性均可接受。有更多证据(1B级)支持抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)药物(阿达木单抗,依那西普,戈利木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)在治疗PsA的体征和症状以及减少放射学进展方面的功效。注册表数据显示没有新的安全隐患,尽管迄今为止研究的数字相对较小。结论:该SLR揭示了一些证据支持NSAID和合成DMARD的使用,以及抗TNF治疗在PsA中的有效性的良好证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号