首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Comparison of two different dosages of celecoxib with diclofenac for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study.
【24h】

Comparison of two different dosages of celecoxib with diclofenac for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study.

机译:两种不同剂量的塞来昔布与双氯芬酸治疗活动性强直性脊柱炎的比较:一项为期12周的随机,双盲,对照研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of celecoxib compared with diclofenac in subjects with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The basis of the present work was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, controlled study in active AS subjects with three treatment arms: celecoxib 200 mg once a day, celecoxib 200 mg twice a day, and diclofenac SR 75 mg twice a day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in global pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at week 12. Secondary endpoints covered changes in disease activity, functional and mobility capacities, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 458 subjects were randomly assigned to either celecoxib 200 mg once a day (n = 153), celecoxib 200 mg twice a day (n = 150), or diclofenac (n 155). Least square (LS) mean changes from baseline at week 12 on a pain VAS were clinically relevant in all treatment groups (celecoxib 200 mg once a day: -29.1 mm; celecoxib 200 mg twice a day:-31.7 mm; diclofenac:-32.7 mm) and non-inferiorwhen compared to diclofenac. Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study group 20% (ASAS 20) response and mean improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores at week 12 were numerically better on celecoxib 200 mg twice a day (59.7% and-1.32 points) and on diclofenac (60.2% and-1.48 points) than on celecoxib 200 mg once a day (46.0% and-0.99 points). The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was significantly higher on diclofenac (28.4%) than on celecoxib 200 mg once a day (15.0%) or 200 mg twice a day (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of celecoxib 200 mg once a day and 200 mg twice a day was comparable to that of diclofenac 75 mg twice a day with respect to pain reduction. Celecoxib 200 mg twice a day and diclofenac reduced some parameters associated with inflammation more effectively than celecoxib 200 mg once a day. Treatment was well tolerated, with celecoxib (either dose) exhibiting less frequent gastrointestinal adverse events than diclofenac.
机译:目的:证明强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者塞来昔布与双氯芬酸相比具有非劣效性。方法:本研究的基础是对活动性AS受试者进行的为期12周的随机,双盲,对照研究,研究对象分为三个治疗组:塞来昔布200 mg /天,塞来昔布200 mg /天,双氯芬酸SR 75 mg /天一天。主要疗效终点是第12周时视觉模拟量表(VAS)的总体疼痛强度相对于基线的变化。次要终点涵盖疾病活动,功能和活动能力以及不良事件的变化。结果:总共458名受试者被随机分配到每天一次200毫克的塞来昔布(n = 153),一天两次两次的n塞来昔布200 mg(n = 150)或双氯芬酸(n 155)。在所有治疗组中,疼痛VAS距基线的最小平方(LS)平均变化在临床上均相关(塞来昔布200 mg每天一次:-29.1 mm;塞来昔布200 mg每天两次:-31.7 mm;双氯芬酸:-32.7毫米),且与双氯芬酸相比不逊色。强直性脊柱炎评估研究组20%(ASAS 20)的反应和巴斯的强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)评分的平均改善在数字上优于每天两次塞来昔布200 mg(59.7%和-1.32分)和双氯芬酸。 (60.2%和-1.48点)高于每天一次塞来昔布200 mg的使用(46.0%和-0.99点)。双氯芬酸(28.4%)的胃肠道不良事件发生率显着高于塞来昔布200 mg /天(15.0%)或200 mg /天两次(16.7%)。结论:就疼痛减轻而言,塞来昔布200 mg一天一次和200 mg一天2次每天的疗效与双氯芬酸75 mg一天两次的疗效相当。每天两次塞来昔布200 mg和双氯芬酸比每天一次塞来昔布200 mg更有效地降低了一些与炎症相关的参数。治疗耐受性好,塞来昔布(两种剂量)与双氯芬酸相比,胃肠道不良事件的发生率更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号