首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Systematic review of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training of the lower limb compared with other intensities of strength training in older adults
【24h】

Systematic review of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training of the lower limb compared with other intensities of strength training in older adults

机译:下肢高强度进行性阻力训练与其他强度训练的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To examine the effect of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training (HIPRST) on strength, function, mood, quality of life, and adverse events compared with other intensities in older adults. Data Sources: Online databases were searched from their inception to July 2012. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials of HIPRST of the lower limb compared with other intensities of progressive resistance strength training (PRST) in older adults (mean age ≥65y) were identified. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently completed quality assessment using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and data extraction using a prepared checklist. Data Synthesis: Twenty-one trials were included. Study quality was fair to moderate (PEDro scale range, 3-7). Studies had small sample sizes (18-84), and participants were generally healthy. Meta-analyses revealed HIPRST improved lower-limb strength greater than moderate- and low-intensity PRST (standardized mean difference [SMD]=.79; 95% confidence interval [CI],.40 to 1.17 and SMD=.83; 95% CI, -.02 to 1.68, respectively). Studies where groups performed equivalent training volumes resulted in similar improvements in leg strength, regardless of training intensity. Similar improvements were found across intensities for functional performance and disability. The effect of intensity of PRST on mood was inconsistent across studies. Adverse events were poorly reported, however, no correlation was found between training intensity and severity of adverse events. Conclusions: HIPRST improves lower-limb strength more than lesser training intensities, although it may not be required to improve functional performance. Training volume is also an important variable. HIPRST appears to be a safe mode of exercise in older adults. Further research into its effects on older adults with chronic health conditions across the care continuum is required.
机译:目的:与老年人相比,高强度渐进式阻力强度训练(HIPRST)与其他强度的对比对强度,功能,情绪,生活质量和不良事件的影响。数据来源:从开始到2012年7月,一直在线搜索数据库。研究选择:确定了下肢HIPRST与其他年龄段(平均年龄≥65岁)进行的渐进式阻力强度训练(PRST)强度相比的随机对照试验。数据提取:两位审阅者使用物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)量表独立完成质量评估,并使用准备好的清单进行数据提取。数据综合:包括21个试验。研究质量中等至中等(PEDro评分范围为3-7)。研究样本量较小(18-84),参与者总体上健康。荟萃分析显示,HIPRST的下肢强度比中强度和低强度PRST大(标准均差[SMD] =。79; 95%置信区间[CI] .40至1.17,SMD = .83; 95% CI,分别为-.02至1.68)。不论训练强度如何,小组进行等效训练量的研究都可以使腿部力量得到类似的改善。在功能强度和残疾强度方面也发现了类似的改进。在所有研究中,PRST强度对情绪的影响均不一致。不良事件的报道很少,但是,训练强度与不良事件的严重程度之间没有相关性。结论:HIPRST可以提高下肢的强度,而不是降低训练强度,尽管可能不需要提高功能表现。培训量也是一个重要变量。 HIPRST似乎是老年人的安全运动方式。需要进一步研究其在整个护理过程中对具有慢性健康状况的老年人的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号