首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent?
【24h】

Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent?

机译:抗风湿性关节炎患者先前失败后,哪类亚组的风湿性关节炎患者可以从利妥昔单抗转用抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)替代治疗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to TNF antagonists (aTNFs) may switch to an alternative aTNF or start treatment from a different class of drugs, such as rituximab (RTX). It remains unclear in which clinical settings these therapeutic strategies offer most benefit. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of RTX versus alternative aTNFs on RA disease activity in different subgroups of patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients with RA who discontinued at least one aTNF and subsequently received either RTX or an alternative aTNF, nested within the Swiss RA registry (SCQM-RA) was carried out. The primary outcome, longitudinal improvement in 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28), was analysed using multivariate regression models for longitudinal data and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 318 patients with RA included; 155 received RTX and 163 received an alternative aTNF. The relative benefit of RTX varied with the type of prior aTNF failure: when the motive for switching was ineffectiveness to previous aTNFs, the longitudinal improvement in DAS28 was significantly better with RTX than with an alternative aTNF (p = 0.03; at 6 months, -1.34 (95% CI -1.54 to -1.15) vs -0.93 (95% CI -1.28 to -0.59), respectively). When the motive for switching was other causes, the longitudinal improvement in DAS28 was similar for RTX and alternative aTNFs (p = 0.40). These results were not significantly modified by the number of previous aTNF failures, the type of aTNF switches, or the presence of co-treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. CONCLUSION: This observational study suggests that in patients with RA who have stopped a previous aTNF treatment because of ineffectiveness changing to RTX is more effective than switching to an alternative aTNF.
机译:背景:类风湿关节炎(RA)患者对TNF拮抗剂(aTNF)的反应不足,可能会改用其他aTNF或从另一类药物开始治疗,例如利妥昔单抗(RTX)。尚不清楚这些治疗策略在哪些临床环境中提供最大的益处。目的:分析RTX与替代性aTNFs对不同亚组患者RA疾病活动性的有效性。方法:一项针对前瞻性队列研究的RA患者中止了至少一种aTNF,随后接受了嵌套在瑞士RA登记册(SCQM-RA)中的RTX或替代aTNF。使用多变量回归模型对纵向数据进行了分析,并针对潜在的混杂因素进行了分析,得出了主要结果,即28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)的纵向改善。结果:在318例RA患者中; 155例接受RTX,163例接受另一种aTNF。 RTX的相对益处随先前aTNF失败的类型而异:当转换动机是对先前aTNF无效时,使用RTX的DAS28的纵向改善明显优于其他aTNF(p = 0.03;在6个月时,- 1.34(95%CI -1.54至-1.15)和-0.93(95%CI -1.28至-0.59)。当切换的动机是其他原因时,对于RTX和替代性aTNF,DAS28的纵向改善是相似的(p = 0.40)。这些结果并未因先前的aTNF失败次数,aTNF开关类型或与疾病缓解性抗风湿药共同治疗的存在而显着改变。结论:这项观察性研究表明,在RA患者中,由于无效转用RTX而停止了先前的aTNF治疗比转用其他aTNF更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号