首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of lateral epicondylitis in computer professionals
【24h】

Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of lateral epicondylitis in computer professionals

机译:肌筋膜松解术在计算机专业人员外侧上con炎管理中的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of lateral epicondylitis in computer professionals. Objective: To investigate whether myofascial release (MFR) reduces the pain and functional disability of lateral epicondylitis (LE) in comparison with a control group receiving sham ultrasound therapy in computer professionals. Design: Randomized, controlled, single blinded trial. Setting: Nonprofit research foundation clinic in Kerala, India. Participants: Computer professionals (N=68) with LE. Interventions: MFR group or control group. The techniques were administered by certified MFR practitioners and consisted of 12 sessions per client over 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measure: The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scale was used to assess pain severity and functional disability. The primary outcome measure was the difference in PRTEE scale scores between week 1 (pretest score), week 4 (posttest score), and follow-up at week 12 after randomization. Results: The simple main effects analysis showed that the MFR group performed better than the control group in weeks 4 and 12 (P<.005). Patients in the MFR and control groups reported a 78.7% and 6.8% reduction, respectively, in their pain and functional disability in week 4 compared with that in week 1, which persisted as 63.1% in the follow-up at week 12 in the MFR group. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that MFR is more effective than a control intervention for LE in computer professionals.
机译:肌筋膜释放在计算机专业人员的外侧上epi炎管理中的有效性。目的:与计算机专业接受深超声治疗的对照组相比,研究肌筋膜释放(MFR)是否能减轻外侧上con炎(LE)的疼痛和功能障碍。设计:随机,对照,单盲试验。地点:印度喀拉拉邦的非营利研究基金会诊所。参与者:LE的计算机专业人员(N = 68)。干预措施:MFR组或对照组。该技术由MFR认证的从业者管理,每位客户12个疗程,共4周。主要观察指标:使用患者评级的网球肘评估量表(PRTEE)评估疼痛的严重程度和功能障碍。主要结局指标是随机分组后第1周(测试前评分),第4周(测试后评分)和随访12周之间的PRTEE量表评分之间的差异。结果:简单的主效应分析表明,MFR组在第4周和第12周的表现优于对照组(P <.005)。 MFR组和对照组的患者在第4周的疼痛和功能障碍分别比第1周减少了78.7%和6.8%,在MFR第12周的随访中,疼痛和功能障碍持续了63.1%组。结论:这项研究提供了证据,证明计算机专家的MFR比LE的控制干预更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号