...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Prediction of peak oxygen consumption from the ratings of perceived exertion during a graded exercise test and ramp exercise test in able-bodied participants and paraplegic persons.
【24h】

Prediction of peak oxygen consumption from the ratings of perceived exertion during a graded exercise test and ramp exercise test in able-bodied participants and paraplegic persons.

机译:根据强健的参与者和截瘫患者的分级运动测试和坡道运动测试中的感知劳累等级预测峰值耗氧量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of predicting peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak) from a graded exercise test (GXT) and a ramp exercise test during arm exercise in able-bodied persons and persons with paraplegia using ratings of perceived exertion (RPEs). DESIGN: Each participant performed a GXT (started at 30W and increased by 15W every 2min) and a ramp exercise test (started at 0W and increased by 15W.min(-1)). SETTING: Universities' laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: Able-bodied men (n=13; mean +/- SD, 27.2+/-4.3y) and men with paraplegia (n=12; 31.1+/-5.7y). Six of the persons with paraplegia had flaccid paralysis as a result of poliomyelitis infection. The other 6 persons had complete spinal cord injuries with neurologic levels at and below T6. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction of Vo(2)peak by extrapolating submaximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2)) and RPE values to RPE 20 on the Borg 6 to 20 RPE scale. RESULTS: This study showed a very strong linear relationship between RPE and Vo(2) during the GXT and the ramp test for able-bodied persons (R(2)>/=.95 and R(2)>/=.96, respectively) and persons with paraplegia (R(2)>/=.96 and R(2)>/=.95, respectively). There was no significant difference between measured and predicted Vo(2)peak from RPEs before and including RPE 13, 15, and 17 during the GXT for persons with paraplegia (P>.05). For the able-bodied participants, there was no significant difference between measured and predicted Vo(2)peak from RPEs before and including RPE 15 and 17 during the ramp exercise test (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The GXT provided acceptable predictions of Vo(2)peak for persons with paraplegia, and the ramp test provided acceptable predictions of Vo(2)peak for able-bodied persons.
机译:目的:通过感知锻炼(RPEs)等级评估健全锻炼者和截瘫患者在手臂锻炼过程中通过分级锻炼测试(GXT)和坡道锻炼测试预测峰值耗氧量(Vo(2)peak)的准确性)。设计:每位参与者进行了一次GXT(从30W开始,每2分钟增加15W)和一次坡道运动测试(从0W开始,增加15W.min(-1))。地点:大学实验室。参与者:身体健全的男性(n = 13;平均+/- SD,27.2 +/- 4.3y)和截瘫的男性(n = 12; 31.1 +/- 5.7y)。截瘫患者中有六个因脊髓灰质炎感染而患有松弛性麻痹。其他6人脊髓完全受伤,神经学水平在T6及以下。干预:不适用。主要观察指标:通过将次最大氧气消耗量(Vo(2))和RPE值外推到Borg 6至20 RPE标尺上的RPE 20来预测Vo(2)peak。结果:这项研究表明,在GXT和健全人的坡道测试期间,RPE和Vo(2)之间的线性关系非常强(R(2)> / =。95和R(2)> / =。96,和截瘫患者(分别为R(2)> / =。96和R(2)> / =。95)。对于截瘫患者,在GXT期间,包括RPE 13、15和17在内的RPE测得的和预测的Vo(2)峰值之间没有显着差异(P> .05)。对于健壮的参与者,在坡道运动测试期间,从RPE之前和包括RPE 15和17的RPE测得的和预测的Vo(2)峰值之间没有显着差异(P> .05)。结论:GXT为截瘫患者提供了可接受的Vo(2)peak预测,而斜面试验为身体健全的患者提供了Vo(2)peak可接受的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号