...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Comparison of metabolic cost and cardiovascular response to stair ascending and descending with walkers and canes in older adults
【24h】

Comparison of metabolic cost and cardiovascular response to stair ascending and descending with walkers and canes in older adults

机译:老年人步行和拐杖对楼梯上升和下降的代谢成本和心血管反应的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare oxygen cost (mL·kg-1·m -1) and cardiovascular response (beats/m) and oxygen consumption (mL·kg-1·min-1) and heart rate (beats/min) to stair ascending and descending with walkers, with canes, and without assistive devices (ADs) in older adults. Design Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting Indoor stairway. Participants Convenience sample of able-bodied volunteers, non-AD users (N=14; mean age, 63.71±11.7y; mean body mass, 72.7±14.1kg; mean height, 165.7±9.2cm). Interventions Participants performed 4 randomized trials of stair ascending and descending at their own self-selected speed with 3 ADs: single-point cane, standard walker (SW), and wheeled walker (WW). They also performed unassisted stair ascending and descending. Each trial consisted of a 5-minute steady-state session followed by a 2-minute data collection period. Steady-state expired ventilations were collected in Douglas bags for metabolic analysis. Main Outcome Measures Oxygen cost (mL·kg-1·m-1), heart rate (HR) response (beats/m), oxygen consumption (mL·kg-1·min -1), and HR (beats/min) were compared for each trial of stair ascending and descending using analysis of variance repeated measures (P.05). Results Greater oxygen cost (per meter) was found for stair ascending and descending using the single-point cane (121%), SW (217%), and WW (232%) compared with unassisted stair ascending and descending (P.05). Increased HR response (per meter) was found for stair ascending and descending using the single-point cane (116%), SW (126%), and WW (147%) compared with unassisted stair ascending and descending (P.05). However, oxygen consumption (per minute) and HR (per minute) were not significantly increased during stair ascending and descending with the ADs compared with unassisted stair ascending and descending. Participants stair ascended and descended at significantly (P.05) reduced speeds during trials with the ADs. Conclusions This research should aid clinicians by providing evidence to base recommendations on regarding AD usage when encountering stairs during home and community ambulation.
机译:目的比较阶梯上升和上升时的氧气消耗(mL·kg-1·m -1)和心血管反应(次/ m),耗氧量(mL·kg-1·min-1)和心率(次/ min)。老年人在步行者,拐杖和没有辅助装置(AD)的情况下下降。设计描述性的,重复的措施。设置室内楼梯。参与者身体健康的志愿者(非AD使用者)的便利性样本(N = 14;平均年龄:63.71±11.7y;平均体重:72.7±14.1kg;平均身高:165.7±9.2cm)。干预参与者通过3种AD:单点拐杖,标准助行器(SW)和轮式助行器(WW),以自己的自行选择的速度进行了4次关于楼梯上升和下降的随机试验。他们还进行了无助的楼梯升降。每个试验包括一个5分钟的稳态会议以及一个2分钟的数据收集期。在道格拉斯袋中收集稳态过期的通气以进行代谢分析。主要指标氧耗(mL·kg-1·m-1),心率(HR)反应(次/米),耗氧量(mL·kg-1·min -1)和HR(次/分钟)使用方差重复测量的分析对每个楼梯上升和下降试验进行比较(P <.05)。结果发现,单步拐杖(121%),西南偏航(217%)和WW(232%)相比,阶梯爬升和下降的氧气成本(每米)要高,而非阶梯爬升和下降的氧气成本(P <.05) )。使用单点拐杖(116%),西南(126%)和WW(147%)进行楼梯升降时,发现HR响应(每米)增加,而无辅助楼梯升降时(P <.05) 。然而,与无辅助楼梯的上升和下降相比,AD在楼梯上升和下降期间的耗氧量(每分钟)和HR(每分钟)没有显着增加。在进行AD的试验中,参与者的楼梯上升和下降的速度显着降低(P <.05)。结论这项研究应通过提供证据,为基于家庭和社区活动中上楼梯时使用AD的建议提供依据,从而为临床医生提供帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号