首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Repeated six-minute walk tests for outcome measurement and exercise prescription in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: a longitudinal study.
【24h】

Repeated six-minute walk tests for outcome measurement and exercise prescription in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: a longitudinal study.

机译:在门诊心脏康复中重复六分钟步行测试以评估结局和运动处方:一项纵向研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether repeated 6-minute walk tests (6MWTs) are required for outcome measurement and exercise prescription in a typical cardiac rehabilitation (CR) population. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Outpatient community health center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one of 154 consecutive patients. INTERVENTION: 6MWTs (N = 2) were conducted at 3 assessment points: at CR start, postcompletion, and 6-months postcompletion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 6MWT distance (6MWD). RESULTS: Mean 6MWD for the first (6MWT1) and second (6MWT2) 6MWTs at the 3 assessment points were 507 +/- 85 (522 +/- 84), 532 +/- 86 (560 +/- 87), and 549 +/- 99 (575 +/- 107)m. Repeated 6MWDs strongly correlated at each assessment point, with intraclass correlation coefficients of .96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-.98), .97 (95% CI, .92-.98), and .94 (95% CI, .89-.97), respectively. Relative increases in mean 6MWD from 6MWT1 to 6MWT2 at each assessment point were 3%, 5%, and 5%, respectively (P<.001 in each case). Differences in walking speed derived from 6MWD1 and 6MWD2 did not translate into differences in exercise prescription. CONCLUSIONS: The difference between 6MWD1 and 6MWD2 was consistent regardless of previous exposure to 6MWTs. A single 6MWT was as effective as 2 repeated 6MWTs for outcome measurement and exercise prescription. We therefore recommend that when 6MWDs are used for CR outcome measurement, either a single 6MWT be used or the number of 6MWTs performed be consistent at all assessment points.
机译:目的:确定在典型的心脏康复(CR)人群中,是否需要重复6分钟步行测试(6MWT)来进行结局测量和运动处方。设计:前瞻性纵向观察研究。地点:门诊社区卫生中心。参与者:154名连续患者中的61名。干预:在3个评估点进行了6MWT(N = 2):CR开始,完成后和完成后6个月。主要观察指标:6MWT距离(6MWD)。结果:在三个评估点上,第一个(6MWT1)和第二个(6MWT2)6MWT的平均6MWD为507 +/- 85(522 +/- 84),532 +/- 86(560 +/- 87)和549 +/- 99(575 +/- 107)米重复的6MWD在每个评估点均具有高度相关性,组内相关系数分别为.96(95%置信区间[CI],0.93-.98)、. 97(95%CI,.92-.98)和.94(95 %CI,.89-.97)。在每个评估点,平均6MWD从6MWT1到6MWT2的相对增加分别为3%,5%和5%(每种情况下P <.001)。由6MWD1和6MWD2得出的步行速度差异并未转化为运动处方的差异。结论:6MWD1和6MWD2之间的差异是一致的,无论以前是否接触过6MWT。对于结果测量和运动处方,单个6MWT与2个重复6MWT一样有效。因此,我们建议将6MWD用于CR结果测量时,在所有评估点使用单个6MWT或执行的6MWT数量均应一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号