...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine >Performance differences between conventional smears and liquid-based preparations of thyroid fine-needle aspiration samples: Analysis of 47 076 responses in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in non-gynecologic cytology
【24h】

Performance differences between conventional smears and liquid-based preparations of thyroid fine-needle aspiration samples: Analysis of 47 076 responses in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in non-gynecologic cytology

机译:常规涂片检查与甲状腺细针抽吸样品液基制剂之间的性能差异:美国妇产科学院非妇科细胞学实验室间比较计划中47 076例反应的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context.-Controversy exists about whether thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) should be processed with conventional smears or liquid-based preparations (LBPs). Objective.-To compare the performance of conventional smears to LBPs for thyroid FNA slides circulated in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology. Design.-Participant responses for thyroid FNA slides were compared with the reference diagnosis at the level of 3 general diagnostic categories: negative, suspicious (which included only follicular and Hü rthle cell neoplasm), and malignant. For specific reference diagnoses of benign/ goiter and papillary thyroid carcinoma, the participants' specific diagnoses were analyzed and poorly performing slides were rereviewed. Results.-The 47 076 thyroid FNA slide responses, between 2001 and 2009, included 44 478 responses (94%) for conventional smears and 2598 responses (6%) for LBPs. For the general reference category negative, participant responses were discrepant in 14.9% of conventional smears compared with 5.9% for LBPs (P .001). The specific reference diagnosis of benign/goiter was misdiagnosed as a follicular neoplasm in 7.8% of conventional smears, comparedwith 1.3% of LBP. For the general reference category of malignant, participant responses were discrepant in 7.3% of conventional smears compared with 14.7% of LBPs (P .001). The specific reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma was misdiagnosed as benign/goiter in 7.2% of LBPs, compared with 4.8% of conventional smears (p .001). Conclusions.-LBPs performed worse than conventional smears for cases with a reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, LBPs performed better than conventional smears for cases with a benign reference diagnosis. Specific features in thyroid FNAs that may improve the diagnostic accuracy of LBPs and conventional smears are described.
机译:关于是否应使用常规涂片或液基制剂(LBP)处理甲状腺细针抽吸物(FNA)存在争议。目的:比较在非妇科细胞学美国病理学家实验室间比较计划中散发的甲状腺FNA玻片常规涂片对LBPs的表现。甲状腺FNA载玻片的设计参与者反应与参考诊断在3个一般诊断类别的水平上进行了比较:阴性,可疑(仅包括滤泡性和Hüthle细胞瘤)和恶性。对于良性/甲状腺肿和甲状腺乳头状癌的具体参考诊断,分析了参与者的具体诊断,并对表现不佳的玻片进行了复查。结果:-2001年至2009年之间的47076例甲状腺FNA滑动反应包括常规涂片检查的44 478例反应(94%)和LBP的2598例反应(6%)。对于一般参考类别为阴性的参与者,在常规涂片中的回应率为14.9%,而LBP为5.9%(P 0.001)。良性/甲状腺肿的具体参考诊断被误诊为7.8%常规涂片中的滤泡性肿瘤,而LBP为1.3%。对于恶性肿瘤的一般参考类别,参与者的反应在常规涂片中占7.3%,而LBPs则为14.7%(P 0.001)。 7.2%的LBPs误诊为甲状腺乳头状癌的特定参考诊断为良性/甲状腺肿,而常规涂片检查则为4.8%(p 0.001)。结论:对于参考诊断为甲状腺乳头状癌的病例,-LBPs的表现比常规涂片差。但是,对于良性参考诊断病例,LBP的表现优于常规涂片。甲状腺FNA的特定功能可能会改善LBP和常规涂片的诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号