首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Factor structure and predictive validity of somatic and nonsomatic symptoms from the patient health questionnaire-9: a longitudinal study after spinal cord injury.
【24h】

Factor structure and predictive validity of somatic and nonsomatic symptoms from the patient health questionnaire-9: a longitudinal study after spinal cord injury.

机译:来自患者健康调查表9的躯体和非躯体症状的因子结构和预测有效性:一项脊髓损伤后的纵向研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factor structure and predictive validity of somatic and nonsomatic depressive symptoms over the first 2.5 years after spinal cord injury (SCI) using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). DESIGN: Somatic and nonsomatic symptoms were assessed at baseline during inpatient hospitalization (average of 50 days after onset) and during 2 follow-ups (average of 498 and 874 days after onset). SETTING: Data were collected at a specialty hospital in the Southeastern United States and analyzed at a medical university. We performed time-lag regression between inpatient baseline and follow-up somatic and nonsomatic latent factors of the PHQ-9. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with traumatic SCI (N=584) entered the study during inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: PHQ-9, a 9-item measure of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The inpatient baseline nonsomatic latent factor was significantly predictive of the nonsomatic (r=.40; P=.000) and somatic latent factors at the second follow-up (r=.29; P=.006), whereas the somatic factor at inpatient baseline did not significantly predict either factor. In contrast, when regressing latent factors between the 2 follow-ups, the nonsomatic factor predicted only the nonsomatic factor (r=.66; P=.002), and the somatic factor predicted only future somatic symptoms (r=.66; P=.000). In addition, the factor structure was not stable over time. Item analysis verified the instability of somatic items between inpatient baseline and follow-up and also indicated that self-harm at inpatient baseline was highly predictive of future self-harm. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsomatic symptoms are better predictors of future depressive symptoms when first assessed during inpatient rehabilitation, whereas somatic symptoms become stable predictors only after inpatient rehabilitation. Self-harm (suicidal ideation) is the most stable symptom over time. Clinicians should routinely assess for suicidal ideation and use nonsomatic symptoms when performing assessments during inpatient rehabilitation.
机译:目的:使用《患者健康问卷-9》(PHQ-9)调查脊髓损伤(SCI)后的最初2。5年中躯体和非躯体性抑郁症状的因子结构和预测有效性。设计:在住院期间(发病后平均50天)和两次随访(发病后498天和874天平均)进行基线时的躯体和非躯体症状评估。地点:数据是在美国东南部的一家专科医院收集的,并在医科大学进行了分析。我们进行了住院基线与随访的PHQ-9体细胞和非体细胞潜在因素之间的时滞回归。参与者:患有创伤性脊髓损伤的成年人(N = 584)在住院康复期间进入研究。干预措施:不适用。主要观察指标:PHQ-9,抑郁症状的9项指标。结果:在第二次随访中,住院患者的基线非躯体潜在因素可显着预测非躯体潜在因素(r = .40; P = .000)和躯体潜在因素(r = .29; P = .006),而躯体潜在因素住院基线时的因素没有显着预测任何因素。相反,当在两次随访之间回归潜在因素时,非躯体因素仅预测非躯体因素(r = .66; P = .002),而躯体因素仅预测未来的躯体症状(r = .66; P = .000)。另外,因素结构随着时间的推移不稳定。项目分析验证了躯体项目在住院基线和随访之间的不稳定性,并表明住院基线的自我伤害高度预测了未来的自我伤害。结论:在住院康复期间首次评估非躯体症状是未来抑郁症状的较好预测指标,而躯体症状仅在住院康复后才成为稳定的预测指标。随着时间的流逝,自残(自杀念头)是最稳定的症状。在住院康复期间进行评估时,临床医生应常规评估是否有自杀观念,并使用非躯体症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号