首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Inpatient cancer rehabilitation: a retrospective comparison of transfer back to acute care between patients with neoplasm and other rehabilitation patients.
【24h】

Inpatient cancer rehabilitation: a retrospective comparison of transfer back to acute care between patients with neoplasm and other rehabilitation patients.

机译:住院癌症康复:肿瘤患者和其他康复患者之间转回到急性护理的回顾性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with diagnoses of neoplasm undergoing acute rehabilitation differ from other patients in frequency of acute care transfer and type of medical complications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Acute rehabilitation hospital located within an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with diagnosis of neoplasm (n=40) and patients without neoplasm (n=253) requiring transfer were identified from a database of 2801 rehabilitation discharges over nearly a 4-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of unplanned transfer and reasons for the transfer. RESULTS: Significant difference occurred in overall rate of transfer between patients with neoplasm (21%) and controls (9.7%; P.001). When evaluated separately for type of neoplasm (with patients receiving corresponding type of rehabilitation as controls), a significantly higher rate of transfer to acute care was found for brain tumor (25% vs 12%; P=.004) and spinal cord neoplasms (23% vs 10%; P=.009), but statistical significance was not reached for other tumor types (12.5% vs 7.4%; P=.19). Patients with stroke with neoplasm as a comorbidity, analyzed separately, with the other patients with stroke as controls, had significantly higher risk of transfer (22% vs 10%; P=.012). Logistic regression analysis found an odds ratio (OR) of 2.5 for unplanned transfer among patients with diagnosis of neoplasm (OR=2.5 for malignancy; OR=2.4 for benign neoplasm). Patients with neoplasm had infection as the most common reason for transfer (28% of the neoplasm transfers vs 18% of other transfers; P=.01), whereas in the nonneoplasm group, cardiopulmonary factors predominated (12% of patients with tumor vs 31% of patients without tumor transfers; P.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present sample, patients with neoplasm were more likely to require transfer than patients without neoplasm, although this pattern did not reach statistical significance for noncentral nervous system cases. Overall, patients with neoplasm appear more likely than those without neoplasm to have an infectious cause for unplanned transfer. Increased awareness of this difference may lead to improved medical management on rehabilitation units.
机译:目的:确定诊断为急性康复的肿瘤患者是否与其他患者在急性护理转移频率和医疗并发症类型方面有所不同。设计:回顾性队列分析。地点:位于学术医学中心内的急性康复医院。参与者:在近4年的时间里,从2801例康复出院的数据库中识别出诊断为肿瘤的患者(n = 40)和无肿瘤的患者(n = 253)。干预措施:不适用。主要观察指标:计划外转移的频率和转移原因。结果:肿瘤患者(21%)和对照组之间的总转移率存在显着差异(9.7%; P <.001)。当单独评估肿瘤类型(以接受相应类型的康复治疗的患者作为对照)时,发现脑肿瘤(25%vs 12%; P = .004)和脊髓肿瘤的急性护理转移率显着更高( 23%vs. 10%; P = .009),但其他肿瘤类型未达到统计学意义(12.5%vs. 7.4%; P = .19)。单独分析并以其他患有中风的患者为对照,以肿瘤为合并症的中风患者的转移风险显着更高(22%vs 10%; P = .012)。 Logistic回归分析发现诊断为肿瘤的患者中计划外转移的比值比(OR)为2.5(恶性肿瘤为OR = 2.5;良性肿瘤为OR = 2.4)。肿瘤患者以感染为最常见的转移原因(肿瘤转移的28%比其他转移的18%; P = .01),而在非肿瘤组中,心肺因素占主导地位(肿瘤患者的12%比31无肿瘤转移的患者百分比; P <.001)。结论:在本样本中,具有肿瘤的患者比没有肿瘤的患者更需要转移,尽管这种模式对于非中枢神经系统病例没有统计学意义。总体而言,与无肿瘤的患者相比,有肿瘤的患者似乎更有可能引起计划外转移的感染。对这种差异的认识的提高可能会导致康复单位的医疗管理得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号