首页> 外文期刊>Nanoscale >Insight into the photocatalytic mechanism of the optimal x value in the BiOBrxI1−x, BiOClxI1−x and BiOClxBr1−x series varying with pollutant type
【24h】

Insight into the photocatalytic mechanism of the optimal x value in the BiOBrxI1−x, BiOClxI1−x and BiOClxBr1−x series varying with pollutant type

机译:深入了解BiOBrxI1−x、BiOClxI1−x和BiOClxBr1−x系列中随污染物类型变化的最优x值的光催化机理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is known that bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, X = Cl, Br, I) can easily form solid solutions like BiOBrxI1−x, BiOClxI1−x and BiOClxBr1−x (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) and exhibit composition-dependent photocatalytic performance. However, the reported results indicate that the optimal composition changes with pollutant type. That is to say, the specific x value with the best photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of a certain pollutant does not imply that it is an optimum x value for another pollutant. In order to explore the reason behind this, herein, three types of solid solutions with various x values were prepared in ethylene glycol/H2O (VEG : VH2O = 1) solution at room temperature, and their photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of bisphenol A (BPA), tetracycline (TC), malachite green (MG), methyl violet (MV) and rhodamine B (RhB) was assessed under visible-light illumination. Taking BiOBrxI1−x as an example, BiOBr0.5I0.5 exhibited the best degradation efficiency for BPA, MV and MG, whereas BiOBr0.95I0.05 possessed the best photocatalytic activity towards TC and RhB degradation. Detailed characterization suggests that light absorption and charge separation efficiency are not the main factors behind this difference. Given that direct oxidation of the holes was dominant in the degradation process, the oxidation ability of the solid solutions was correlated with the oxidation behavior of the pollutant. The prerequisite condition for degrading a certain pollutant is that the valence band potential of the solid solution should be more positive than the oxidation potential of the pollutant, and yet, too big a difference between these two potentials does not benefit rapid degradation.
机译:众所周知,铋oxyhalides (BiOX X = Cl,Br, I)可以很容易地形成固体的解决方案1)和展览composition-dependent光催化性能。结果表明,最优组合随着污染物变化类型。特定的x值与最好的光催化活动一定的退化污染物并不意味着这是一个最佳的x价值的另一种污染物。这背后的原因,在此,三种类型的坚实的解决方案与各种x值准备在乙二醇/水(蔬菜:VH2O = 1)溶液在室温下,他们的光催化活性退化双酚A (BPA),四环素(TC),孔雀石绿(MG),甲基紫(MV)和罗丹明B (RhB)评估可见光照明。一个例子,BiOBr0.5I0.5表现出最好的双酚a降解效率,MV和毫克,而BiOBr0.95I0.05拥有最好的对TC和RhB光催化活性退化。光吸收和电荷分离效率并不是这背后的主要因素的区别。孔是主要在降解过程中,氧化能力是固体的解决方案相关的氧化行为污染物。降解特定污染物价乐队的潜力固溶体比的氧化潜力更积极污染物,然而,太大的区别这两个势不快速受益退化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号