首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Cytoreductive surgery with selective versus complete parietal peritonectomy followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A controlled study
【24h】

Cytoreductive surgery with selective versus complete parietal peritonectomy followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A controlled study

机译:弥漫性恶性腹膜间皮瘤患者的选择性减壁腹膜切除术与完全壁膜腹膜切除术然后进行高温腹膜内化疗的细胞减少手术:一项对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background. Combined treatment involving peritonectomy procedures, multivisceral resections, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has reportedly resulted in survival benefit for peritoneal surface malignancies, including diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). Many unanswered questions remain regarding the surgical options in the management of DMPM. The aim of this case-control studywas to assess the impact of the type and extent of parietal peritonectomy on survival and operative outcomes. Methods. Thirty patients with DMPM undergoing selective parietal peritonectomy (SPP) of macroscopically involved regions, and 30 matched patients undergoing routine complete parietal peritonectomy (CPP), regardless of disease distribution, were retrospectively identified from a prospective database. Results. Groups were comparable for all characteristics, except for a higher proportion of patients treated before July 2003 and undergoing preoperative systemic chemotherapy in the SPP group. Median follow-up was 86.2 months in the SPP group and 50.3 months in the CPP group. Median overall survival was 29.6 months in the SPP group and not reached in the CPP group; 5-year overall survival was 40.0% and 63.9%, respectively (P = 0.0269). At multivariate analysis, CPP versus SPP was recognized as an independent predictor of better prognosis, along with complete cytoreduction, negative lymph nodes, epithelial histology, and lower MIB-1 labelling index. Morbidity and reoperation rates were not different between groups. No operative mortality occurred. In 12 of 24 patients undergoing CPP, pathologic examination detected disease involvement on parietal surfaces with no evident tumor at surgical exploration. Conclusions. CPP improved survival in patients with DMPM undergoing combined treatment. This information may contribute to standardize surgical options for DMPM and other peritoneal malignancies.
机译:背景。据报道,包括腹膜切除术,多脏器切除和腹膜高温化疗(HIPEC)在内的联合治疗已为腹膜表面恶性肿瘤(包括弥漫性恶性腹膜间皮瘤(DMPM))带来了生存优势。关于DMPM管理中的外科手术选择,还有许多悬而未决的问题。该病例对照研究的目的是评估壁膜腹膜切除术的类型和程度对生存率和手术结果的影响。方法。从前瞻性数据库中回顾性地确定了30例DMPM患者,这些患者在宏观上受累区域进行了选择性顶切腹膜切除术(SPP),以及30例进行了常规完全顶切腹膜切除术(CPP)的匹配患者,无论其疾病分布如何。结果。除2003年7月之前接受治疗且在SPP组进行术前全身化疗的患者比例较高外,各组的所有特征均具有可比性。 SPP组中位随访时间为86.2个月,CPP组中位随访时间为50.3个月。 SPP组的中位总生存期为29.6个月,而CPP组没有达到。 5年总生存率分别为40.0%和63.9%(P = 0.0269)。在多变量分析中,CPP与SPP以及完整的细胞减少,阴性淋巴结,上皮组织学和较低的MIB-1标记指数一起被认为是预后较好的独立预测因子。两组之间的发病率和再次手术率没有差异。没有手术死亡发生。在接受CPP的24例患者中,有12例在手术探查中发现病理检查发现顶叶表面有疾病累及,没有明显的肿瘤。结论CPP改善了接受联合治疗的DMPM患者的生存率。该信息可能有助于标准化DMPM和其他腹膜恶性肿瘤的手术选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号