首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Lymph node counts and ratio in axillary dissections following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: A better alternative to traditional pN staging
【24h】

Lymph node counts and ratio in axillary dissections following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: A better alternative to traditional pN staging

机译:乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结清扫术的淋巴结计数和比率:传统pN分期的更好替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for breast cancer might change the number of involved and detected nodes in axillary lymph node dissections (ALND). In this study, we analyzed whether the number of dissected nodes and the lymph node ratio (LNR, defined as the proportion of involved nodes in dissected nodes) would have a better prognostic value than traditional pN staging. Methods: A total of 569 patients with stage II, III breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a median of three cycles of NCT followed by mastectomy and ALND. Clinical and pathological variables were investigated using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Results: In post-NCT node-negative (LN-) patients, those with 4-9 dissected nodes experienced a significantly lower relapse-free survival (RFS) compared with those with 10 or more dissected nodes (hazard ratio = 0.19, 0.41, for 10-19 nodes, 20+ nodes, respectively; 4-9 nodes as the reference; P = 0.002). In post-NCT node-positive (LN+) patients, a lower LNR was correlated with a better RFS on multivariate analysis, and pN staging failed to show independent prognostic significance when the LNR was included in the Cox regression model (hazard ratio = 4.2, 2.97, 2.24, and 1.68 for LNR 81-100, 61-80, 41-60; and 21-40 %, respectively; LNR 0-20 % as the reference. P < 0.001). In addition, there were significant differences in the estimated 5-year RFS for pN1 (P = 0.043) and pN3 patients (P = 0.03) among the different LNR subgroups. Conclusions: Our study has provided new evidence that the number of dissected nodes (in LN- patients) and the LNR (in LN+ patients) might be a complementary or alternative method to traditional pN staging when evaluating disease after primary treatment.
机译:背景:针对乳腺癌的新辅助化疗(NCT)可能会改变腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)中累及和检测到的淋巴结数目。在这项研究中,我们分析了解剖结节的数目和淋巴结比率(LNR,定义为解剖结节中受累结节的比例)是否比传统的pN分期具有更好的预后价值。方法:本回顾性研究共纳入569例II,III期乳腺癌患者。所有患者均接受了NCT三个周期的中位数,然后行乳房切除术和ALND。使用单因素和多因素生存分析调查临床和病理变量。结果:在NCT后淋巴结阴性(LN-)患者中,与4个或9个以上淋巴结清扫患者相比,4-9个淋巴结清扫患者的无复发生存率(RFS)明显较低(危险比= 0.19、0.41,对于10-19个节点,分别为20+个节点;以4-9个节点为参考; P = 0.002)。在多变量分析中,NCT后结节阳性(LN +)患者中,较低的LNR与较好的RFS相关;当Cox回归模型中包含LNR时,pN分期未能显示独立的预后意义(危险比= 4.2, LNR 81-100、61-80、41-60和21-40%分别为2.97、2.24和1.68; LNR 0-20%作为参考(P <0.001)。此外,在不同的LNR亚组中,pN1(P = 0.043)和pN3患者(P = 0.03)的5年RFS估算值存在显着差异。结论:我们的研究提供了新的证据,即在评估初次治疗后的疾病时,解剖结节数(在LN-患者中)和LNR(在LN +患者中)可能是传统pN分期的补充或替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号