...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Therapeutic surgical management of palpable melanoma groin metastases: superficial or combined superficial and deep groin lymph node dissection.
【24h】

Therapeutic surgical management of palpable melanoma groin metastases: superficial or combined superficial and deep groin lymph node dissection.

机译:可触及的黑色素瘤腹股沟转移的治疗性外科手术治疗:浅表性腹股沟或深部腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with clinically detectable lymph node metastasis to the groin is by ilioinguinal or combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) according to most literature, but in practice superficial groin dissection (SGD) only is still performed in some centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the experience in CGD versus SGD patients in our center. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2009, 121 therapeutic CGD and 48 SGD were performed in 169 melanoma patients with palpable groin metastases at our institute. Median follow-up was 20 and, for survivors, 45 months. RESULTS: In this heterogeneous group of patients, overall (OS) and disease-free survival, local control rates, and morbidity rates were not significantly different between CGD and SGD patients. However, CGD patients had a trend towards more chronic lymphedema. Superficial lymph node ratio, the number of positive superficial lymph nodes, and the presence of deep nodes were prognostic factors for survival. CGD patients with involved deep lymph nodes (24.8%) had estimated 5-year OS of 12% compared with 40% with no involved deep lymph nodes (p=0.001). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan had high negative predictive value of 91% for detection of pelvic nodal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that survival and local control do not differ for patients with palpable groin metastases treated by CGD or SGD. Patients without pathological iliac nodes on CT might safely undergo SGD, while CGD might be reserved for patients with multiple positive nodes on SGD and/or positive deep nodes on CT scan.
机译:背景:根据大多数文献,通过i咽或浅表和深层腹股沟淋巴清扫术(CGD)处理可检测到的腹股沟淋巴结转移的患者,但实际上在某些中心仍仅进行浅表腹股沟清扫术(SGD)。这项研究的目的是评估我们中心CGD与SGD患者的经验。方法:从1991年到2009年,我院对169例有明显腹股沟转移的黑色素瘤患者进行了121例治疗性CGD和48例SGD。中位随访为20个月,幸存者为45个月。结果:在这组异类患者中,CGD和SGD患者的总体(OS)和无病生存期,局部控制率和发病率没有显着差异。但是,CGD患者有更多的慢性淋巴水肿趋势。浅表淋巴结比率,阳性浅表淋巴结数目和深层结节的存在是生存的预后因素。有深部淋巴结受累的CGD患者(24.8%)估计5年OS为12%,而没有深层淋巴结受累的40%(p = 0.001)。术前计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描对盆腔淋巴结受累的阴性预测值很高,为91%。结论:这项研究表明,经CGD或SGD治疗的腹股沟明显转移患者的生存率和局部控制无差异。 CT上没有病理性nodes骨结节的患者可以安全地接受SGD,而CGD可能保留用于SGD上有多个阳性淋巴结和/或CT扫描上有深层阳性的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号