首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >A Prospective Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Costs
【24h】

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Costs

机译:腹腔镜胃旁路术与腹腔镜可调胃束带治疗病态肥胖结局,生活质量和费用的前瞻性随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding are the 2 most commonly performed bariatric procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes, quality of life, and costs of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic gastric banding. Study Design: Between 2002 and 2007, 250 patients with a body mass index of 35 to 60 kg/m2 were randomly assigned to gastric bypass or gastric banding. After exclusion, 111 patients underwent gastric bypass and 86 patients underwent gastric banding. Outcome measures included demographic data, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, early and late reoperation rate, weight loss, changes in quality of life, and cost. Treatment failure was defined as losing less than 20% of excess weight or conversion to another bariatric operation for failure of weight loss. Results: There were no deaths at 90 days in either group. The mean body mass index was higher in the gastric bypass group (47.5 vs. 45.5 kg/m~2, respectively, P < 0.01) while the mean age was higher in the gastric band group (45 vs. 41 years, respectively, P < 0.01). Compared with gastric banding, operative blood loss was higher and the mean operative time and length of stay were longer in the gastric bypass group. The 30-day complication rate was higher after gastric bypass (21.6% vs. 7.0% for gastric band); however, there were no life-threatening complications such as leaks or sepsis. The most frequent late complication in the gastric bypass group was stricture (14.3%). The 1-year mortality was 0.9% for the gastric bypass group and 0% for the gastric band group. The percent of excess weight loss at 4 years was higher in the gastric bypass group (68 +- 19% vs. 45 +- 28%, respectively, P < 0.05). Treatment failure occurred in 16.7% of the patients who underwent gastric banding and in 0% of those who underwent gastric bypass, with male gender being a predictive factor for poor weight loss af
机译:背景:胃旁路术和可调节胃束带术是用于治疗病态肥胖的两种最常用的减肥手术。这项研究的目的是比较腹腔镜胃搭桥术与腹腔镜胃绑扎术的结局,生活质量和费用。研究设计:在2002年至2007年之间,将250例体重指数为35至60 kg / m2的患者随机分配为胃搭桥术或胃绑扎术。排除后,有111例患者进行了胃搭桥术,有86例患者进行了胃绑扎术。结果指标包括人口统计学数据,手术时间,失血量,住院时间,发病率,死亡率,早期和晚期再手术率,体重减轻,生活质量变化和费用。治疗失败定义为体重减轻不足20%或因减肥失败而改用其他减肥手术。结果:两组均在90天无死亡。胃搭桥组的平均体重指数较高(分别为47.5和45.5 kg / m〜2,P <0.01),而胃束带组的平均年龄则较高(分别为45和41岁,P <0.01)。与胃束带术相比,胃搭桥术组术中出血量更高,平均手术时间和住院时间更长。胃搭桥术后30天并发症发生率更高(21.6%vs.胃束带为7.0%);但是,没有发生危及生命的并发症,例如泄漏或败血症。胃搭桥组中最常见的晚期并发症是狭窄(14.3%)。胃搭桥组的1年死亡率为0.9%,胃束带组为1%。胃搭桥组在4年时的多余体重减轻百分比更高(分别为68±19%和45±28%,P <0.05)。接受胃束带术的患者中有16.7%发生了治疗失败,接受胃搭桥术的患者中有0%发生了治疗失败,其中男性是导致体重下降的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号