...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: A systematic review
【24h】

Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: A systematic review

机译:轻度胆源性胰腺炎后胆囊切除术的时机:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To determine the risk of recurrent biliary events in the period after mild biliary pancreatitis but before interval cholecystectomy and to determine the safety of cholecystectomy during the index admission. Background: Although current guidelines recommend performing cholecystectomy early after mild biliary pancreatitis, consensus on the definition of early (ie, during index admission or within the first weeks after hospital discharge) is lacking. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies published from January 1992 to July 2010. Included were cohort studies of patients with mild biliary pancreatitis reporting on the timing of cholecystectomy, number of readmissions for recurrent biliary events before cholecystectomy, operative complications (eg, bile duct injury, bleeding), and mortality. Study quality and risks of bias were assessed. Results: After screening 2413 studies, 8 cohort studies and 1 randomized trial describing 998 patients were included. Cholecystectomy was performed during index admission in 483 patients (48%) without any reported readmissions. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in 515 patients (52%) after 40 days (median; interquartile range: 19-58 days). Before interval cholecystectomy, 95 patients (18%) were readmitted for recurrent biliary events (0% vs 18%, P < 0.0001). These included recurrent biliary pancreatitis (n = 43, 8%), acute cholecystitis (n = 17), and biliary colics (n = 35). Patients who had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had fewer recurrent biliary events (10% vs 24%, P = 0.001), especially less recurrent biliary pancreatitis (1% vs 9%). There were no differences in operative complications, conversion rate (7%), and mortality (0%) between index and interval cholecystectomy. Because baseline characteristics were only reported in 26% of patients, study populations could not be compared. Conclusions: Interval cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is associated with a high risk of readmission for recurrent biliary events, especially recurrent biliary pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy during index admission for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe, but selection bias could not be excluded.
机译:目的:确定轻度胆源性胰腺炎后但间隔胆囊切除术之前再次发生胆道事件的风险,并确定准入指数期间胆囊切除术的安全性。背景:尽管目前的指南建议在轻度胆源性胰腺炎后早期进行胆囊切除术,但仍缺乏关于早期定义的共识(即在入院期间或出院后的头几周内)。方法:我们对PubMed,Embase和Cochrane进行了系统的检索,以研究1992年1月至2010年7月发表的研究。该研究包括对轻度胆源性胰腺炎患者进行胆囊切除术的时间,对胆囊切除术前再次发生胆道事件的再入院人数的队列研究。 ,手术并发症(例如胆管损伤,出血)和死亡率。评估研究质量和偏倚风险。结果:筛选了2413项研究后,纳入了8项队列研究和1项描述998例患者的随机试验。 483例患者(48%)在接受索引期间进行了胆囊切除术,但未报告再次入院。 40天后(中位数;四分位间距:19-58天),对515例患者(52%)进行了间隔性胆囊切除术。在间隔性胆囊切除术之前,95例患者(18%)因再次发生胆道事件而再次入院(0%对18%,P <0.0001)。这些疾病包括复发性胆源性胰腺炎(43例,8%),急性胆囊炎(17例)和胆绞痛(35例)。内镜逆行胰胆管造影的患者复发胆道事件较少(10%vs 24%,P = 0.001),尤其是复发胆道胰腺炎更少(1%vs 9%)。指数和间歇性胆囊切除术之间的手术并发症,转化率(7%)和死亡率(0%)没有差异。由于仅26%的患者报告了基线特征,因此无法比较研究人群。结论:轻度胆源性胰腺炎后进行间隔性胆囊切除术与复发性胆道疾病,特别是复发性胆源性胰腺炎的再次入院风险较高。轻度胆源性胰腺炎入院时进行胆囊切除术似乎是安全的,但不能排除选择偏倚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号