首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >A Meta-analysis of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategies to Prevent Pulmonary Complications: Is Low Tidal Volume Alone Sufficient to Protect Healthy Lungs?
【24h】

A Meta-analysis of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategies to Prevent Pulmonary Complications: Is Low Tidal Volume Alone Sufficient to Protect Healthy Lungs?

机译:术中通气策略预防肺部并发症的荟萃分析:低潮气量是否足以保护健康的肺脏?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:The clinical benefits of intraoperative low tidal volume (LTV) mechanical ventilation with concomittent positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and intermittent recruitment maneuverstermed protective lung ventilation (PLV)have not been investigated systematically in otherwise healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia.Methods:Our group performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies (n = 1054) comparing LTV (n = 521) with conventional lung ventilation (n = 533) for associated postoperative incidence of atelectasis, lung infection, acute lung injury (ALI), and length of hospital stay. A secondary analysis of 3 studies comparing PLV (n = 248) with conventional lung ventilation (n = 247) was performed.Results:Although intraoperative LTV ventilation was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative lung infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.68; P = 0.003) compared with a conventional strategy, no difference was noted between groups in incidence of postoperative ALI (OR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.10-1.52; P = 0.17) or atelectasis (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.26-2.81; P = 0.80). Analysis of trials involving protective ventilation (LTV + PEEP + recruitment maneuvers) showed a statistically significant reduction in incidence of postoperative lung infection (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.50; P = 0.0003), atelectasis (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64; P = 0.006), and ALI (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P = 0.008) and length of hospital stay (Mean Difference = -2.08; 95% CI, -3.95 to -0.21; P = 0.03) compared with conventional ventilation.Conclusions:Intraoperative LTV ventilation in conjunction with PEEP and intermittent recruitment maneuvers is associated with significantly improved clinical pulmonary outcomes and reduction in length of hospital stay in otherwise healthy patients undergoing general surgery. Providers should consider application of all the 3 elements for a comprehensive protective ventilation strategy.
机译:背景:在进行全麻治疗的其他健康患者中,尚未系统地研究术中低潮气量(LTV)机械通气,伴随呼气末正压通气(PEEP)和间歇性招募性保护性肺通气(PLV)的临床益处。该组对16项研究(n = 1054)进行了荟萃分析,比较了LTV(n = 521)和常规肺通气(n = 533)的术后肺不张,肺部感染,急性肺损伤(ALI)的发生率和长度住院。进行了3项研究的二级分析,将PLV(n = 248)与常规肺通气(n = 247)进行了比较。结果:尽管术中LTV通气与术后肺部感染的发生率降低相关(比值比[OR] = 0.33;与传统策略相比,95%的置信区间[CI]为0.16-0.68; P = 0.003),两组之间术后ALI的发生率没有差异(OR = 0.38; 95%CI为0.10-1.52; P = 0.17)或肺不张(OR = 0.86; 95%CI,0.26-2.81; P = 0.80)。对涉及保护性通气的试验(LTV + PEEP +募集演习)的分析表明,术后肺部感染的发生率(OR = 0.21; 95%CI,0.09-0.50; P = 0.0003),肺不张(OR = 0.36; 95)有统计学意义的降低%CI,0.20-0.64; P = 0.006)和ALI(OR = 0.15; 95%CI,0.04-0.61; P = 0.008)和住院时间(平均差异= -2.08; 95%CI,-3.95至结论:与常规通气相比,术中LTV通气结合PEEP和间歇性招募操作可显着改善临床肺结局,并缩短其他接受常规手术的健康患者的住院时间。提供者应考虑将所有这三个要素应用于全面的保护性通风策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号