...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Operative surgical education: results of a society of surgical oncology fellowship survey and proposal for an operative database.
【24h】

Operative surgical education: results of a society of surgical oncology fellowship survey and proposal for an operative database.

机译:手术外科教育:外科肿瘤学研究金协会调查的结果和手术数据库的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Preparation of surgical trainees for oncological operative procedures is challenging. The purpose of this survey was to focus on identifying methods and resources used by trainees to prepare for procedures and to ascess the need for additional educational tools. METHODS: A 34-item survey was mailed electronically to 97 surgical oncology fellows at 14 Society of Surgical Oncology-approved training programs. General surgery residents at an affiliate training program (n = 65) and residents attending an American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination review course (n = 129) were polled via hard-copy mailings. The survey was distributed with the Dillman method. Self-education practices, factors influencing operative education, and strengths/weaknesses of available resources were identified. RESULTS: Response rates were 56% and 78% for fellows and residents, respectively. Trainees prepare for more than 50% of cases they perform (82%; 169 of 205), devoting up to 1 hour (87%; 178 of 205) in review the evening before a procedure (64%; 131 of 205). Time availability and attending of record were dominant factors influencing resident preparation, whereas case complexity was the most important variable motivating fellows. Surgical atlases, texts, anatomical references, and case discussion with attending staff were the most useful and available resources rated by trainees. Skills stations were recognized as the least valuable. Critical assessment of six educational resources identified no one particular area for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for contemporary operative educational tools, incorporating time-sensitive and procedure-specific needs of surgical trainees preparing for oncological operative procedures.
机译:背景:为肿瘤外科手术程序培训外科学员是具有挑战性的。这项调查的目的是着重于确定受训者用于准备程序和避免需要额外的教育工具的方法和资源。方法:以电子方式将一项34项调查问卷邮寄给14个经手术肿瘤学会批准的培训计划的97名外科肿瘤学者。参加普通会员培训计划的居民(n = 65)和参加了美国外科外科进修考试课程(n = 129)的居民通过纸质邮件进行了投票。该调查采用Dillman方法分发。确定了自我教育做法,影响手术教育的因素以及可用资源的优势/劣势。结果:同伴和居民的回应率分别为56%和78%。受训者为他们执行的案件的50%以上做准备(82%; 205个中的169个),最多要花1个小时(87%; 205个中的178个)在手术前一个晚上进行复习(64%; 205个中的131个)。时间的可用性和记录的出席是影响居民准备的主要因素,而案件的复杂性是激励同伴们最重要的变量。培训地图集,文本,解剖参考资料以及与参加人员的病例讨论是受训人员最有用和可用的资源。技能站被认为是最有价值的。对六种教育资源的严格评估发现,没有一个特别的改进领域。结论:需要当代的手术教育工具,其中包括对时间敏感的和手术特定的需求的外科手术学员为肿瘤手术做准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号