...
首页> 外文期刊>Lasers in surgery and medicine. >Photodynamic Antimicrobial Effect of Safranine O on an Ex Vivo Periodontal Biofilm
【24h】

Photodynamic Antimicrobial Effect of Safranine O on an Ex Vivo Periodontal Biofilm

机译:光动力抗菌作用的碱性藏红O在体外牙周生物膜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Objective: The increasing resistance of oral pathogens against antibiotic measures urgently requires new therapeutic strategies. In this context, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) may play a crucial part in the future. The aim of the present study was to compare the antibacterial efficiency of aPDT using the photosensitizer safranine O with that of chlorhexidine (0.2% CHX) on an ex vivo biofllm.Methods: First the antibacterial activity of both measures against planktonic cultures of Streptococcus gordonii ATCC 33399, Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, Fuso-bacterium nucleatum ATCC 10953, Aggregatibacter acti-nomycetemcomitans ATCC 33384 and Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277 was observed. Then a patient specific ex vivo biofilm was established from plaque and saliva samples of patients (n = 19) with chronic periodon-titis. The antibacterial effects of aPDT and of 0.2% CHX were determined on the ex vivo biofilms cultivated for 24 and 72 hours. After cultivation of the treated samples on blood agar (2 days) the results were quantified by counting the colony forming units (cfu/ml).Results: Photodynamic treatment with safranine O showed a distinct antibacterial effect on F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis. Whereas S. gordonii was suppressed completely by aPDT, treatment with 0.2% CHX caused only a partial reduction. In the ex vivo biofilm model (24-hour biofilm), aPDT caused a significantly higher bacterial killing than treatment with 0.2% CHX. Compared to the untreated control, there was no significant difference on the 72-hour biofilm for both methods. Conclusions: The results show that oral-pathogenic species in planktonic solution can be suppressed significantly by aPDT with safranine O. Especially for bacteria in a 24-hour ex vivo biofilm, this method is more effective than treatment with 0.2% CHX. Both antibacterial treatments did not show any significant effect on the biofilm cultivated for 72 hours.
机译:背景和目的:增加抗口腔病原体对抗生素迫切需要新的治疗措施策略。光动力疗法(aPDT)可能起到至关重要未来的一部分。是比较的抗菌效率使用光敏剂aPDT碱性藏红O洗必泰(0.2% CHX)体外biofllm。浮游文化的措施链球菌gordonii写明ATCC 33399,链球菌变形链球菌写明ATCC 25175年Fuso-bacterium nucleatum写明ATCC10953年,Aggregatibacter acti-nomycetemcomitans写明ATCC 33384和Porphyromonas gingivalis写明ATCC33277年是观察。活体生物膜从斑块和成立唾液样本的病人与慢性(n = 19)periodon-titis。和0.2%的CHX体外测定生物膜培养24和72小时。种植治疗的样品在血琼脂(2天)计算的结果量化集落形成单位(cfu /毫升)。光动力治疗与碱性藏红O显示f . nucleatum和独特的抗菌效果p . gingivalis。完全由aPDT CHX治疗0.2%只有部分减少造成的。生物膜模型(24小时的生物膜),aPDT造成显著高于细菌杀死治疗CHX 0.2%。未经处理的控制,没有意义72小时的生物膜上的区别方法。oral-pathogenic物种浮游的解决方案能显著抑制aPDT碱性藏红o .特别是细菌24小时体外生物膜,该方法更加有效比治疗CHX 0.2%。治疗没有任何明显的影响的生物膜培养72小时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号