首页> 外文期刊>Organization: The interdisciplinary journal of organization, theory, and society >Controversies as method for ANTi-history: An inquiry into public administration practices
【24h】

Controversies as method for ANTi-history: An inquiry into public administration practices

机译:ANTi-history争议的方法:一个调查公共行政实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drawing on Actor-Network Theory and the cartography of controversies, we present a method for ANTi-History research to investigate the implementation of a contract between a labour services company and a public university hospital in Brazil. The research question focuses on how the past is enacted in the present. The method is a general guideline based on five focal points used to organize the fieldwork: identifying controversies; mapping the actor-network; drawing out the translation process; politics of actor-networks and multiple reality/power relations. The proposed method makes two contributions to ANTi-History literature. First, although these focal points have been discussed by ANTi-History scholars, they are scattered throughout the literature. We unite them to offer a guide to doing historically embedded research. Second, we show how controversy analysis can be helpful for mapping the politics of actor-networks and describing multiple realities in the construction of history.
机译:利用Actor-Network理论和制图的争议,我们提出一个方法ANTi-History研究调查实现劳动力之间的合同服务公司和一个公立大学医院在巴西。过去是制定在当下。基于五个焦点一般指导方针用于组织实地考察:识别争议;翻译过程;actor-networks和多个现实/力量关系。贡献ANTi-History文学。虽然这些焦点一直在讨论ANTi-History学者,他们分散在整个文学。指导做嵌入式的研究历史。第二,我们分析可以说明争议对映射的政治actor-networks和描述多个现实在历史的建筑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号