...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of surgery. >Revisiting percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis based on a 10-year experience
【24h】

Revisiting percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis based on a 10-year experience

机译:基于10年的经验再次探讨经皮胆囊造口术治疗急性胆囊炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To identify patient characteristics leading to percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and to compare outcomes between PC and cholecystectomy (CCY) in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System. Patients: All consecutive patients with AC per the Tokyo criteria who underwent PC or CCY from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2010. Main Outcome Measures: Differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between PC and CCY patients, odds of PC vs CCY use, and odds of death after PC or CCY. Results: Of 480 CCY and 92 PC procedures, 150 CCY and 51 PC procedures were performed for AC. The PC patients were older (70.4 vs 65.0 years, P=.01) and had higher leukocyte counts (16 500 vs 14 700/μL [to convert to ×10 9/L, multiply by 0.001], P=.046), alkaline phosphatase levels (198.2 vs 140.1 U/L [to convert to microkatals per liter, multiply by 0.0167], P=.02), Charlson comorbidity index scores (3.0 vs 1.0, P.001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P=.006) compared with CCY patients. The PC patients had longer intensive care unit stays (5.9 vs 2.3 days, P=.008), longer hospital stays (20.7 vs 12.1 days, P.001), more complications per patient (2.9 vs 1.9, P=.01), and higher readmission rates (31.4% vs 13.3%, P=.006). On multivariate analysis, a Charlson comorbidity index score of 4 or higher was the only independent predictor of treatment with PC vs CCY (odds ratio, 1.226; 95% CI, 1.032- 1.457) and was the only independent predictor of death after PC or CCY (odds ratio, 1.318; 95% CI, 1.143- 1.521). No differences in survival were found between the PC and CCY groups (P=.14). Conclusion: Compared with CCY, PC is associated with higher morbidity rates and should be reserved for patients with prohibitive risks for surgery.
机译:目的:确定导致急性胆囊炎(AC)的患者经皮胆囊造口术(PC)的特征,并比较PC和胆囊切除术(CCY)的结果。设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:退伍军人事务波士顿医疗系统。患者:从2001年1月1日至2010年12月31日,根据东京标准连续接受PC或CCY的所有AC患者。主要结局指标:PC和CCY患者的基线特征和结局差异,PC与CCY的使用几率,以及PC或CCY后的死亡几率。结果:在480个CCY和92个PC程序中,对AC执行了150个CCY和51个PC程序。 PC患者年龄较大(70.4 vs 65.0岁,P = .01),白细胞计数较高(16500 vs 14700 /μL[转换为×10 9 / L,乘以0.001],P = .046),碱性磷酸酶水平(198.2 vs 140.1 U / L [转换为微卡每升,乘以0.0167],P = .02),查尔森合并症指数评分(3.0 vs 1.0,P <.001),以及美国麻醉医师学会分类(P = .006)与CCY患者相比。 PC患者重症监护病房住院时间更长(5.9 vs 2.3天,P = .008),住院时间更长(20.7 vs 12.1天,P <.001),每位患者的并发症更多(2.9 vs 1.9,P = .01) ,再录入率更高(31.4%比13.3%,P = .006)。在多变量分析中,Charlson合并症指数得分为4或更高是PC相对于CCY治疗的唯一独立预测因子(优势比为1.226; 95%CI为1.032-1.457),也是PC或CCY死亡的唯一独立预测因子(比值为1.318; 95%CI为1.143-1.521)。 PC组和CCY组之间未发现生存差异(P = .14)。结论:与CCY相比,PC具有更高的发病率,应保留用于有手术风险的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号