...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Undertriage in the Manchester triage system: An assessment of severity and options for improvement
【24h】

Undertriage in the Manchester triage system: An assessment of severity and options for improvement

机译:曼彻斯特分类系统中的分类不足:对严重性和改进选项的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The Manchester Triage System (MTS) determines an inappropriately low level of urgency (undertriage) to a minority of children. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical severity of undertriaged patients in the MTS and to define the determinants of undertriage. Methods: Patients who had attended the emergency department (ED) were triaged according to the MTS. Undertriage was defined as a 'low urgent' classification (levels 3, 4 and 5) under the MTS; as a 'high urgent' classification (levels 1 and 2) under an independent reference standard based on abnormal vital signs (level 1), potentially life-threatening conditions (level 2), and a combination of resource use, hospitalisation, and follow-up for the three lowest urgency levels. In an expert meeting, three experienced paediatricians used a standardised format to determine the clinical severity. The clinical severity had been expressed by possible consequences of treatment delay caused by undertriage, such as the use of more interventions and diagnostics, longer hospitalisation, complications, morbidity, and mortality. In a prospective observational study we used logistic regression analysis to assess predictors for undertriage. Results: In total, 0.9% (119/13,408) of the patients were undertriaged. In 53% (63/119) of these patients, experts considered undertriage as clinically severe. In 89% (56/63) of these patients the high reference urgency was determined on the basis of abnormal vital signs. The prospective observational study showed undertriage was more likely in infants (especially those younger than three months), and in children assigned to the MTS 'unwell child' flowchart (adjusted OR 3 months 4.2, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.7 and adjusted OR unwell child 11.1, 95% CI 5.5 to 22.3). Conclusion: Undertriage is infrequent, but can have serious clinical consequences. To reduce significant undertriage, the authors recommend a systematic assessment of vital signs in all children.
机译:背景:曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)为少数儿童确定了不适当的低紧急度(未足额分类)。该研究的目的是评估MTS中未足月龄患者的临床严重程度,并确定未足月龄的决定因素。方法:根据MTS对就诊急诊科(ED)的患者进行分类。不足类别被定义为多边贸易体制下的“低紧急”分类(3、4和5级);在基于异常生命体征(1级),可能危及生命的状况(2级)以及资源使用,住院和随访的综合考虑的独立参考标准下,作为“高紧急”分类(1级和2级)进行分类,达到三个最低紧急程度。在一次专家会议上,三位经验丰富的儿科医生使用标准化格式确定临床严重程度。临床严重性已由流产不足引起的治疗延误的可能后果表示,例如使用更多的干预措施和诊断方法,更长的住院时间,并发症,发病率和死亡率。在一项前瞻性观察研究中,我们使用逻辑回归分析来评估预测不足的预测因素。结果:总共有0.9%(119 / 13,408)的患者年龄不足。在这些患者中,有53%(63/119)的专家认为,临床不足是严重的。在这些患者中,有89%(56/63)是根据异常生命体征确定较高的参考尿急。一项前瞻性观察研究表明,婴儿(尤其是三个月以下的婴儿)以及被分配到MTS“不适儿童”流程图中的儿童(超过OR的3个月调整为4.2,95%CI为2.3至7.7,并且调整为OR不适)的儿童发生过流产的可能性更高。儿童11.1,95%CI 5.5至22.3)。结论:流产很少见,但可能会产生严重的临床后果。为了减少重大的流产,作者建议系统评估所有儿童的生命体征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号