...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Methods of weaning preterm babies <30 weeks gestation off CPAP: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

Methods of weaning preterm babies <30 weeks gestation off CPAP: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

机译:CPAP妊娠<30周的早产婴儿断奶的方法:一项多中心随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Controversy exists whether different continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) weaning methods influence time to wean off CPAP, CPAP duration, oxygen duration, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) or length of admission.In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, the authors have primarily compared CPAP weaning methods impact on time to wean off CPAP and CPAP duration and secondarily their effect on oxygen duration, BPD and time of admission.Between April 2006 and October 2009, 177 infants <30 weeks gestational age (GA) who fulfilled stability criteria on CPAP were randomised to one of the three CPAP weaning methods (M). M1: Taken 'OFF' CPAP with the view to stay 'OFF'. M2: Cycled on and off CPAP with incremental time 'OFF'. M3: As with m(2), cycled on and off CPAP but during 'OFF' periods were supported by 2 mm nasal cannula at a flow of 0.5 l/min.Based on intention to treat analysis, there was no significant difference in mean GA or birthweight between the groups (27.1 ± 1.4, 26.9 ± 1.6 and 27.3 ± 1.5 (weeks ± 1SD) and 988 ± 247, 987 ± 249 and 1015 ± 257 (grams ± 1SD), respectively). Primary outcomes showed M1 produced a significantly shorter time to wean from CPAP (11.3 ± 0.8, 16.8 ± 1.0, 19.4 ± 1.3 (days ± 1SE) p<0.0001, respectively) and CPAP duration (24.4 ± 0.1, 38.6 ± 0.1, 30.5 ± 0.1 (days ± 1SE) p<0.0001, respectively). All the secondary outcomes were significantly shorter with M1, (oxygen duration: 24.1 ± 1.5, 45.8 ± 2.2, 34.1 ± 2.0 (days ± 1SE) p<0.0001, BPD: 7/56 (12.5%), 29/69 (42%), 10/52 (19%) p=0.011 and length of admission: 58.5 ± 0.1, 73.8 ± 0.1 69.5 ± 0.1 (days ± 1SE) p<0.0001, respectively).Method 1 significantly shortens CPAP weaning time, CPAP duration, oxygen duration, BPD and admission time.
机译:是否存在不同的持续气道正压(CPAP)断奶方法是否影响断奶时间,CPAP持续时间,氧气持续时间,支气管肺发育不良(BPD)或入院时长存在争议。在一项多中心随机对照试验中,作者主要比较了CPAP断奶方法影响断奶时间和CPAP持续时间的影响,其次对氧气持续时间,BPD和入院时间的影响。2006年4月至2009年10月之间,对符合CPAP稳定性标准的177个<30周胎龄(GA)婴儿进行了随机分组三种CPAP断奶方法之一(M)。 M1:采取“关闭” CPAP并保持“关闭”状态。 M2:以递增时间“ OFF”循环打开和关闭CPAP。 M3:与m(2)一样,循环CPAP开关,但在'OFF'期间由2 mm鼻导管以0.5 l / min的流量支撑。基于治疗分析的意图,均值无显着差异两组之间的GA或出生体重(分别为27.1±1.4、26.9±1.6和27.3±1.5(周±1SD)和988±247、987±249和1015±257(克±1SD))。主要结果显示,M1的CPAP断奶时间明显缩短(分别为11.3±0.8、16.8±1.0、19.4±1.3(天±1SE)p <0.0001)和CPAP持续时间(24.4±0.1、38.6±0.1、30.5± 0.1(天±1SE)分别为p <0.0001)。 M1的所有次要结局均明显缩短,(供氧时间:24.1±1.5,45.8±2.2,34.1±2.0(天±1SE)p <0.0001,BPD:7/56(12.5%),29/69(42% ),10/52(19%)p = 0.011,入院时间分别为58.5±0.1、73.8±0.1 69.5±0.1(天±1SE)p <0.0001)。方法1显着缩短了CPAP断奶时间,CPAP持续时间,氧气持续时间,BPD和入院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号