...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition >Human or monitor feedback to improve mask ventilation during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
【24h】

Human or monitor feedback to improve mask ventilation during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

机译:人工或监测反馈以改善模拟新生儿心肺复苏过程中的面罩通气

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To investigate if external chest compressions (ECC) increase mask leak, and if human or technical feedback improves mask ventilation during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Study design In this observational study, 32 participants delivered positive pressure ventilation (PPV) to a modiffed, leak-free manikin via facemask. Mask leak, tidal volume (V_T), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and respiratory rate (RR) were measured with a respiratory function monitor (RFM). Participants had to perform four studies. In the first study, participants performed PPV alone as baseline. Thereafter, three studies were performed in random order. In the PPV +ECC+manometer group, participants had to observe the manometer while the RFM was covered; in the PPV +ECC+RFM group, the RFM was used while the manometer was covered; and in the PPV+ECC+verbal feedback group, the RFM and manometer were covered while a team leader viewed the RFM and provided verbal feedback to the participants. Results Median (IQR) mask leak of all studies was 15% (5-47%). Comparing the studies, PPV+ECC+RFM and PPV+ECC+verbal feedback had significantly less mask leak than PPV+ECC+manometer.Mean (SD) V_T of all studies was 9.5+3.5 mL. Comparing all studies, PPV+ECC+RFM had a significantly higher V_T than PPV and PPV+ECC +manometer. As well, PPV+ECC+verbal feedback had a significantly higher V_T than PPV.PEEP and RR were within our target, mean (SD) PEEP was 6+-2 cmH_2O and RR was 36+-13/min, Conclusions During simulated neonatal CPR, ECCs did not influence mask leak, and a RFM and verbal feedback were helpful methods to reduce mask leak and increase V_T significantly.
机译:目的探讨在模拟新生儿心肺复苏(CPR)期间,外部胸外按压(ECC)是否会增加面罩泄漏,以及人类或技术反馈是否会改善面罩通气。研究设计在这项观察性研究中,有32位参与者通过面罩向正畸的,无泄漏的人体模型提供了正压通气(PPV)。使用呼吸功能监测仪(RFM)测量面罩泄漏,潮气量(V_T),呼气末正压(PEEP)和呼吸频率(RR)。参加者必须进行四项研究。在第一项研究中,参与者仅以PPV作为基线。此后,以随机顺序进行了三项研究。在PPV + ECC +压力表组中,参与者必须在RFM覆盖的情况下观察压力表。在PPV + ECC + RFM组中,在覆盖压力计的情况下使用RFM;在PPV + ECC +语言反馈组中,RFM和压力计被涵盖,而团队负责人查看了RFM并向参与者提供了口头反馈。结果所有研究的中位(IQR)面罩泄漏率为15%(5-47%)。比较研究结果,PPV + ECC + RFM和PPV + ECC +语言反馈的面罩泄漏明显少于PPV + ECC +压力表。所有研究的平均值(SD)V_T为9.5 + 3.5 mL。比较所有研究,PPV + ECC + RFM的V_T显着高于PPV和PPV + ECC +压力计。同样,PPV + ECC +语言反馈的V_T明显高于PPV。PEEP和RR均在我们的目标范围内,平均(SD)PEEP为6 + -2 cmH_2O,RR为36 + -13 / min,结论CPR,ECC不影响面罩泄漏,而RFM和言语反馈是减少面罩泄漏并显着增加V_T的有用方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号