首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics: An International Journal Integrating Experimental, Clinical and Social Studies on Ageing >Frailty and survival of older Chinese adults in urban and rural areas: results from the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging.
【24h】

Frailty and survival of older Chinese adults in urban and rural areas: results from the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging.

机译:中国老年人在城市和农村地区的虚弱和生存:北京纵向老龄化研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Differences in frailty between rural and urban older adults have been demonstrated in developed countries. It is not understood how the apparently greater differences in living conditions between different types of regions in China may affect health and outcomes of older Chinese adults. Here, a frailty index (FI) based on the accumulation of health deficits was used to investigate health and survival differences in older Chinese men and women. We studied rural (n=1121) and urban (n=2136) older adults (55-97 years old) in the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), of whom 48.9% (rural) and 35.4% (urban) died over 8 years of follow-up. The FI was generated from 35 self-reported health deficits. The mean FI increased exponentially with age (r(2)=0.87) and was higher in women than in men. The death rate increased significantly with increases in the FI, but women showed a lower death rate than did men. The mean FI in urban older adults (0.12+/-0.10) was lower than that in their rural counterparts (0.14+/-0.12, p<0.001). Urban dwellers showed better survival compared with their counterparts in the rural areas. Adjusted by age, sex, and education level, the hazard ratio for death for each increment of the FI was 1.28 for urban people and 1.27 for rural people. Chinese urban dwellers showed better health and survival than rural dwelling older adults. The FI readily summarized health and mortality differences among different geographic regions, reflecting the impact of the environment, socioeconomics, and medical services on deficit accumulation and on survival.
机译:在发达国家,农村和城市老年人的身体虚弱存在差异。目前尚不清楚中国不同类型地区之间生活条件的明显差异如何影响中国老年人的健康和结局。在这里,基于健康缺陷累积的脆弱指数(FI)被用来调查中国老年男女的健康和生存差异。在北京纵向老龄化研究(BLSA)中,我们研究了农村(n = 1121)和城市(n = 2136)老年人(55-97岁),其中48.9%(农村)和35.4%(城市)死亡8年的随访。 FI是由35个自我报告的健康赤字产生的。平均FI随年龄呈指数增长(r(2)= 0.87),女性高于男性。随着FI的增加,死亡率显着增加,但是女性的死亡率比男性低。城市老年人的平均FI(0.12 +/- 0.10)低于农村老年人(0.14 +/- 0.12,p <0.001)。与农村地区的居民相比,城市居民的生存状况更好。根据年龄,性别和教育程度进行调整后,FI每次增加所致的死亡危险比是城市人为1.28,农村人为1.27。中国的城市居民比农村的老年人显示出更好的健康和生存能力。金融机构容易地总结了不同地理区域之间的健康和死亡率差异,反映了环境,社会经济和医疗服务对赤字积累和生存的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号