首页> 外文期刊>Aquaculture >Effects of prawn stocking density and feeding management on rice-prawn culture
【24h】

Effects of prawn stocking density and feeding management on rice-prawn culture

机译:对虾饲养密度和饲养管理对稻虾养殖的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effects of prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) stocking density and the use of commercial diet on rice-prawn culture were evaluated. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial, with a control (rice monoculture, RM) and four replicates for each treatment. The treatments were: 2 prawns m(-2) without feed (2W), 2 prawns m(-2) with feed (2F), 5 prawns m(-2) without feed (5W) and 5 prawns m(-2) with feed (5F). Mean survival varied from 17.2 +/- 9.3% (5F) to 39.2 +/- 14.9% (2F), and mean weight from 20.3 +/- 2.2 g (2W) to 25.7 +/- 5.85 g (2F). Prawn productivity ranged between 118 +/- 58 kg ha(-1) (2W) and 224 +/- 46 kg ha(-1) (5W). No significant interactions were observed between feeding management and densities. Survival rate was significantly higher (P 0.05) for the 2 prawn m(-2) density while the other variables did not vary significantly among treatments. Rice yields were not statistically different among treatments and varied from 4608 +/- 1225 kg ha(-1) (2F) and 5620 +/- 1202 kg ha(-1) (RM). The results indicate that the rice-prawn system is technically feasible and does not need the addition of commercial diet. Economic analysis showed that stoking 5 prawns m(-2) was not profitable. Total production costs and gross revenue were US$ 1337.84 and US$ 1182.07 for rice monoculture and US$ 2655.60 and US$ 2738.70 for the rice-prawn system(2 prawns m(-2); without feed), respectively. Therefore, the integrated rice-prawn system is a suitable alternative to make rice production economically feasible on small farms without government subsidies.
机译:评估了虾(罗氏沼虾)的放养密度和商业饮食对稻虾养殖的影响。实验设计完全随机分为2 x 2因子,并带有对照(大米单培养,RM),每种处理重复四次。处理方法为:不带饲料(2W)的2个虾m(-2),不带饲料(2F)的2个虾m(-2),不带饲料(5W)的5个虾m(-2)和5个m(-2)的虾带饲料(5F)。平均存活率从17.2 +/- 9.3%(5F)到39.2 +/- 14.9%(2F),平均体重从20.3 +/- 2.2 g(2W)到25.7 +/- 5.85 g(2F)。大虾的生产率介于118 +/- 58 kg ha(-1)(5W)和224 +/- 46 kg ha(-1)(5W)之间。在饲喂管理和密度之间没有观察到明显的相互作用。 2个大虾m(-2)密度的成活率显着更高(P <0.05),而其他变量在治疗之间没有显着变化。水稻产量在不同处理之间无统计学差异,分别为4608 +/- 1225 kg ha(-1)(2F)和5620 +/- 1202 kg ha(-1)(RM)。结果表明,稻虾系统在技术上是可行的,不需要添加商业饮食。经济分析表明,取5个大虾m(-2)并不有利。稻米单一养殖的总生产成本和总收入分别为1337.84美元和1182.07美元,稻虾系统(2虾m(-2);无饲料)分别为2655.60美元和2738.70美元。因此,综合稻虾对虾系统是使无政府补贴的小型农场在经济上可行的稻米生产的合适替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号