首页> 外文期刊>Aquacultural Engineering: An International Journal >Solids removal from a coldwater recirculating system - comparison of a swirl separator and a radial-flow settler.
【24h】

Solids removal from a coldwater recirculating system - comparison of a swirl separator and a radial-flow settler.

机译:从冷水循环系统中去除固体-旋流分离器和径向流沉降器的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Solids removal across two settling devices, i.e., a swirl separator and a radial-flow settler, and across a microscreen drum filter was evaluated in a fully recirculating system containing a single 150 m3 'Cornell-type' dual-drain tank during the production of food-size Arctic char and rainbow trout. The flow through the culture tank was 4500-4800 L/min. Approximately 92-93% of the system flow exited through the Cornell-type sidewall drain. The remaining 7-8% of the flow, approximately 340 L/min, exited through a bottom-center drain and an external standpipe and then to the settling tank. The surface-loading rate applied to both settling tank designs was 0.0031 m3/s per square meter (4.6 gpm/ft2) of settling area. The swirl separator and the radial-flow settler were evaluated over a range of feeding rates to evaluate the relationship between inlet TSS concentration and TSS removal efficiency. There was a highly significant difference (P<0.001) in mean TSS removal efficiency of the swirl separator and radial-flow settler, (+or-S.E.) 37.1+or-3.3% and 77.9+or-1.6%, respectively. Also, TSS removal efficiency of the radial-flow settler was less variable than removal efficiency of the swirl separator. The trend in TSS removal efficiency was consistent over a broad range of inlet TSS concentrations to the separator. A mass balance indicates that the swirl separator only removed approximately 23% of the total mass of TSS removed from this recirculating system. However, when the radial-flow settler was operated in the same recirculating system, it accounted for approximately 48% of the mass of TSS removed from the system daily. The mass balance calculations also indicate that the microscreen drum filter accounted for approximately 40-45% of the mass of TSS removed daily from the recirculating system when using either settling device. In either case, these results indicate that drum filter treatment of the entire recirculating flow played an important role in preventing elevated TSS concentrations from accumulating within a recirculating system.
机译:在一个全循环系统中,评估了通过两个沉降装置(即旋流分离器和径向流沉降器)以及微筛鼓式过滤器中的固体去除过程,该系统包含一个150 m3的“康奈尔型”双排水罐。食品大小的北极红点鲑和虹鳟鱼。通过培养罐的流量为4500-4800 L / min。大约92-93%的系统流量通过康奈尔型侧壁排水口排出。其余的7-8%的流量(约340 L / min)通过底部中心排水口和外部竖管流出,然后到达沉降罐。两种沉降池设计的表面加载速率均为0.0031 m3 / s /平方米(4.6 gpm / ft2)的沉降面积。在一系列进料速率下对涡旋分离器和径向流沉降器进行了评估,以评估进口TSS浓度与TSS去除效率之间的关系。旋流分离器和径向流沉降器的平均TSS去除效率有极显着差异(P <0.001),分别为(+或-S.E.)37.1+或-3.3%和77.9+或-1.6%。同样,径向流沉降器的TSS去除效率比旋流分离器的去除效率变化较小。 TSS去除效率的趋势在分离器的进口TSS浓度范围很广的情况下是一致的。质量平衡表明旋流分离器仅除去了从该再循环系统中除去的TSS总质量的约23%。但是,当径向流沉降器在同一再循环系统中运行时,它约占每天从系统中去除的TSS质量的48%。质量平衡计算还表明,当使用任一沉降装置时,微滤鼓式过滤器约占每天从再循环系统中去除的TSS的质量的40-45%。无论哪种情况,这些结果都表明,对整个再循环流进行鼓式过滤器处理在防止升高的TSS浓度在再循环系统中累积方面起着重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号