首页> 外文期刊>Health and safety bulletin: HSB >Sentencing Council guideline is a useful cross check in Scotland
【24h】

Sentencing Council guideline is a useful cross check in Scotland

机译:审判委员会指南是一个有用的十字架检查在苏格兰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this legal casenote, we look at an appeal by ScottishPower Generation against the level of fine imposed by a sheriff for failures that led to serious injuries to an employee. The opinion1 of the three members of Scotland's supreme criminal court, the High Court of Justiciary (the "High Court" in this casenote), was delivered by Lord Carloway, the Lord Justice General (LJG), on 3 November 2016. The opinion (judgment) is significant because it considers: the extent to which Scottish courts should have regard to guidelines produced by the Sentencing Council of England and Wales (HSB 445 p.19)2, and concludes that although it is not binding, it provides a useful cross check; the relationship between an extensive list of appeals against fines imposed in Scottish courts and the guideline; and the level of fine that is appropriate in respect of breaches by a very large corporation.
机译:在这个法律casenote,我们看一个吸引力苏格兰能源一代的水平失败导致的罚款的治安官严重的一名员工受伤。苏格兰最高的三名成员刑事法院、高等法院法官(由高等法院审理“高等法院”这casenote),是由主Carloway,最高法院院长(LJG)2016年11月3日。意义重大,因为它认为:在多大程度上苏格兰法院应该考虑哪一个由审判委员会的指导方针英格兰和威尔士(HSB 445年第3期)2,并得出结论虽然没有约束力,它提供了一个有用的交叉检查;广泛的上诉反对罚款在苏格兰法院和指南;水平的适当罚款的违反了一个非常大的公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号