...
首页> 外文期刊>Aquatic Toxicology >Evaluation of the Biotic Ligand Model relative to other site-specific criteria derivation methods for copper in surface waters with elevated hardness
【24h】

Evaluation of the Biotic Ligand Model relative to other site-specific criteria derivation methods for copper in surface waters with elevated hardness

机译:相对于硬度较高的地表水中铜的生物配体模型相对于其他特定地点的标准推导方法的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Biotic Ligand Model to predict Cu toxicity in very hard surface water (>200mg/L as CaCO sub(3)), relative to current copper criteria methodologies (hardness-based equation and the water-effect ratio; WER). To test these methods, we conducted acute Cu toxicity tests with three aquatic test species (Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia pulex and Pimephales promelas) in seven surface waters. The sites were representative of effluent-dependent or effluent-dominated streams common to the arid western United States of America (arid West) and a wide range of water quality variables were tested. In addition, concurrent Cu toxicity tests were conducted in laboratory waters that were matched to hardness and alkalinity of the sites to facilitate calculation of WER values. Results were used to characterize empirical relationships between water quality characteristics and Cu toxicity, and to compare measured Cu toxicity with Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) predictions. Acute toxicity tests were also conducted with C. dubia and P. promelas in a range of Ca or Mg-dominated hardness concentrations to determine the independent effects of Ca or Mg on Cu toxicity at high hardness levels. Conclusions from this study suggest that the BLM generates appropriate criteria for the waters tested in this study when compared to the hardness-based equation or WER approach. Although the historical site-specific methods are useful for surface waters with hardness approximately equal to 250mg/L as CaCO sub(3), the unique conditions of arid West streams require site-specific methods that account for the influences of critical water quality variables (i.e., pH, dissolved organic carbon, alkalinity, Ca, Mg and Na). Therefore, the BLM offers an improved alternative to the hardness-based and WER approaches, particularly for situations where the current methods would be under-protective of sensitive aquatic life.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估生物配体模型相对于当前的铜标准方法(基于硬度的方程式和水效应比; WER)。为了测试这些方法,我们在七个地表水域中对三种水生测试物种(杜鹃花,水蚤和Pimephales promelas)进行了急性铜毒性测试。这些地点代表了干旱的美国西部(干旱西部)常见的依赖废水或以废水为主的河流,并测试了各种水质变量。此外,在实验室水中进行了并行的Cu毒性测试,这些毒性与现场的硬度和碱度相匹配,以方便计算WER值。结果用于表征水质特征与铜毒性之间的经验关系,并将测量的铜毒性与生物配体模型(BLM)预测进行比较。还在C. dubia和P. promelas进行了一系列以Ca或Mg为主的硬度浓度的急性毒性测试,以确定Ca或Mg对高硬度水平下Cu毒性的独立影响。该研究的结论表明,与基于硬度的方程式或WER方法相比,BLM可以为该研究中所测试的水生成合适的标准。尽管历史现场特定方法可用于硬度约为250mg / L的CaCO sub(3)地表水,但干旱西部溪流的独特条件需要特定现场方法来考虑关键水质变量的影响(即pH值,溶解的有机碳,碱度,Ca,Mg和Na)。因此,BLM为基于硬度的方法和WER方法提供了一种改进的替代方法,特别是在当前方法对敏感水生生物的保护不足的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号