...
首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Lack of an effect of standard and supratherapeutic doses of linezolid on QTc interval prolongation.
【24h】

Lack of an effect of standard and supratherapeutic doses of linezolid on QTc interval prolongation.

机译:缺乏标准剂量的利奈唑胺和治疗上剂量的利奈唑胺对QTc间隔延长的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study was conducted in 40 subjects to assess the effect of linezolid on corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation. Time-matched, placebo-corrected QT intervals were determined predose and at 0.5, 1 (end of infusion), 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after intravenous dosing of linezolid 600 and 1,200 mg. Oral moxifloxacin at 400 mg was used as an active control. The pharmacokinetic profile of linezolid was also evaluated. At each time point, the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for placebo-corrected QTcF values (i.e., QTc values adjusted for ventricular rate using the correction methods of Fridericia) for linezolid 600 and 1,200-mg doses were <10 ms, which indicates an absence of clinically significant QTc prolongation. At 2 and 4 h after the moxifloxacin dose, corresponding to the population T(max), the lower bound of the two-sided 90% CI for QTcF when comparing moxifloxacin to placebo was >5 ms, indicating that the study was adequately sensitive to assess QTc prolongation. The pharmacokinetic profile of linezolid at 600 mg was consistent with previous observations. Systemic exposure to linezolid increased in a slightly more than dose-proportional manner at supratherapeutic doses, but the degree of nonlinearity was small. At a supratherapeutic single dose of 1,200 mg of linezolid, no treatment-related increase in adverse events was seen compared to 600 mg of linezolid, and no clinically meaningful effects on vital signs and safety laboratory evaluations were noted.
机译:在40名受试者中进行了一项双盲,安慰剂对照,四次交叉研究,以评估利奈唑胺对校正QT(QTc)间隔延长的影响。在静脉给药利奈唑胺600和1,200 mg后的0.5、1(输注结束),2、4、8、12和24 h之前,确定时间匹配的,安慰剂校正的QT间隔。口服400mg莫西沙星用作活性对照。还评估了利奈唑胺的药代动力学特征。在每个时间点,利奈唑胺600和1,200 mg剂量的安慰剂校正的QTcF值(即,使用Fridericia的校正方法针对心室率调整的QTc值)的90%置信区间(CI)的上限<10 ms,表示没有临床上显着的QTc延长。在莫西沙星剂量后2和4小时,对应于总体T(max),当将莫西沙星与安慰剂进行比较时,QTcF的90%CI的两侧下限为> 5 ms,这表明该研究对评估QTc延长。利奈唑胺在600 mg时的药代动力学特征与以前的观察结果一致。在超治疗剂量下,利奈唑胺的全身暴露以略大于剂量比例的方式增加,但非线性程度很小。 1200毫克利奈唑胺的超治疗剂量下,与600毫克利奈唑胺相比,没有观察到与治疗相关的不良事件增加,并且未发现对生命体征和安全实验室评估具有临床意义的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号