...
【24h】

How should we define failure after surgical shoulder stabilization?

机译:我们应该如何定义失败后手术肩稳定吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: With great interest, we read the systematic review by Harris et al.entitled "Long-Term Outcomes After Bankart Shoulder Stabilization," and we compliment the authors on their extensive and well-designed overview. They describe the long-term outcome, including recurrent instability, return to sport, postoperative osteoarthritis, and Rowe and Constant scores, after the most frequently used Bankart repair techniques, both open and arthroscopic. To keep their pooled data homogeneous, Harris et al. understandably included only those articles in which failures were defined as fully redislocated shoulders. This unfortunately excludes patient-reported subluxations, which would lead to a much higher failure rate. This raises a very important question: How should we define a failure after surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability?
机译:编辑:怀着极大的兴趣,我们阅读哈里斯et al.entitled系统综述“长期结果后板卡特的肩膀我们称赞作者稳定。他们广泛而精心设计的概述。描述的长期结果,包括复发性不稳定,恢复运动,术后骨关节炎,和罗恒定的分数,最常用的开放和板卡特修复技术关节镜。均匀,哈里斯等人可以理解的只包括那些失败的文章被定义为完全redislocated肩膀。这个不幸的是不包括patient-reported半脱位,这将导致高得多失败率。问题:我们应该如何定义一个失败后手术治疗前的肩膀不稳定?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号