...
【24h】

In reply

机译:在回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with interest the study of Siontis and colleagues,1 which reported that, during 2009, among 118 different clinical prediction rules (CPRs) designed to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality, only 10 were studied in 4 or more separate groups of patients, and of these, only 1 CPR was reasonably accurate across all studies.1 Among the 118 CPRs selected for this study, there was also the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), derived from a standardized Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and developed and validated in 2 independent cohorts of older patients hospitalized for acute disease or relapse of a chronic disease, with a close agreement between the estimated and the observed mortality after both 6 months and 1 year of follow-up.
机译:我们与利益Siontis研究和阅读同事1报告说,在2009年期间,在118个不同的临床预测规则知识产权局认为仲裁委员会旨在估计所有原因的风险死亡,只有10个研究4或更多单独的组患者,其中,只有1在所有studies.1 CPR是相当准确的在118碳污染减排方案选择在这项研究中,在那里也是多维预后指数吗(MPI),源自一个标准化的全面老年评估,开发和验证2独立军团的老年患者的需求住院的急性疾病或复发慢性疾病,关闭之间的协议估计和观察到的死亡率6个月和1年的随访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号