首页> 外文期刊>Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cance
【24h】

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cance

机译:环磷酰胺,甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶(CMF)对比激素消融联合醋酸亮丙瑞林作为淋巴结阳性,绝经前乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗:TABLE研究的初步结果(武田辅助乳癌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of leuprorelin acetate in adjuvant treatment in comparison to standard chemotherapy with CMF in premenopausal, estrogen-receptor-positive or unknown, node-positive patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 years of hormone ablation with leuprorelin acetate 11.25 mg as a subcutaneous injection every three months or six courses of CMF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, days 1 and 8, q 4 weeks). The primary study end-point was recurrence-free survival (RFS) after 2 years. Secondary end-points included overall survival, adverse events and hormonal suppression. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 1999, a total of 589 patients with breast cancer were randomized to treatment with leuprorelin acetate or CMF. The data of 227 patients were available for this first interim analysis. One hundred and ten and 117 patients were assigned to leuprorelin acetate and chemotherapy, respectively. Both treatment arms were well balanced for baseline characteristics. So far, no difference between the groups has emerged with respect to recurrence-free or overall survivaL Suppression of serum estradiol levels and menstruation was less marked in the CMF-group compared to the leuprorelin arm. The most common adverse events were low-grade hot flushes, weight gain and increased sweating in the leuprorelin-treated patients and alopecia, nausea and vomiting in the CMF-group. CONCLUSION: According to these preliminary results, ovarian suppression with leuprorelin acetate was as effective as standard chemotherapy for premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive, node-positive early breast cancer.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估绝经前,雌激素受体阳性或未知,淋巴结阳性的早期乳腺癌患者中,醋酸亮丙瑞林与标准化疗联合CMF相比,醋酸亮丙瑞林在辅助治疗中的疗效和耐受性。患者和方法:患者随机分为两组,分别每三个月皮下注射11.25 mg醋酸亮丙瑞林或2个疗程的CMF(环磷酰胺500 mg / m2,甲氨蝶呤40 mg / m2,氟尿嘧啶600 mg)进行2年激素消融/ m2,第1天和第8天,每4周一次)。主要研究终点为2年后的无复发生存期(RFS)。次要终点包括总体生存,不良事件和激素抑制。结果:在1995年至1999年之间,共有589例乳腺癌患者被随机分配接受醋酸亮丙瑞林或CMF治疗。 227例患者的数据可用于该首次中期分析。分别将110例和117例患者分配给醋酸亮丙瑞林和化疗。两个治疗臂的基线特征均保持良好平衡。到目前为止,两组之间在无复发或总体生存率方面尚无差异。与亮丙瑞林组相比,CMF组中血清雌二醇水平的抑制和月经的影响较小。最常见的不良事件是接受亮丙瑞林治疗的患者出现低度潮热,体重增加和出汗增加,而CMF组出现脱发,恶心和呕吐。结论:根据这些初步结果,醋酸亮丙瑞林对卵巢的抑制作用与激素敏感,淋巴结阳性的早期乳腺癌的绝经前妇女的标准化疗效果相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号