...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Soil Ecology >How effective are 'Effective microorganisms (R) (EM)'? Results from a field study in temperate climate
【24h】

How effective are 'Effective microorganisms (R) (EM)'? Results from a field study in temperate climate

机译:“有效微生物(R)(EM)”的效果如何?温带气候实地研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effective microorganisms (R) (EM) is a microbial inoculant promoted to stimulate plant growth and soil fertility in agriculture. In our study we investigated the effects of EM on crop yields and soil microbial parameters in a 4-year field experiment under organic management (2003-2006) in Zurich, Switzerland. Treatments of the EM preparations (i) the spraying agent EMA, (ii) EMA with the EM enriched organic substrate Bokashi and (iii) EMA with Bokashi and farmyard manure were applied in each year. As controls to treatments (i)-(iii) the same treatments were included with sterilised EM preparations and a control without EM application. Crop yields in each year and the soil microbiological parameters soil respiration, microbial biomass (SIR, CFE), dehydrogenase activity and microbial community structure (RISA, CLSU) were determined in spring and autumn 2005 and spring 2006. In laboratory incubation experiments cellulose degradation. N mineralisation potential and N mineralisation from added substrate were determined. The EMA application as spraying agent alone (treatment (i)) showed no significant differences to the untreated control (treatment without EM application) for any of the investigated parameters. Significant differences to the untreated control for crop yields and soil microbial parameters were found if Bokashi was applied in addition to EMA ((ii) and (iii)). However, these differences were not consistent throughout the parameters and sampling times. Treatments with living EM compared with its sterilised control treatments showed no differences on any of the parameters. This indicates that the small effects observed were not caused by the EM microorganisms but rather by the nutrient inputs derived from Bokashi. The sampling time showed stronger effects on soil microbial biomass, soil respiration and microbial community structure when compared to the effects of the treatments. We conclude from our results that 'Effective microorganisms' did not improve yields and soil quality during 4 years of application in this field experiment under the temperate climatic conditions of Central Europe
机译:有效微生物(R)(EM)是一种微生物孕育剂,被促进刺激农业中的植物生长和土壤肥力。在我们的研究中,我们在瑞士苏黎世进行了为期4年的有机管理田间试验(2003年至2006年),研究了EM对作物产量和土壤微生物参数的影响。每年使用EM制剂的处理(i)喷涂剂EMA,(ii)含有EM富集的有机基质Bokashi的EMA和(iii)具有Bokashi和农家肥的EMA。作为处理(i)-(iii)的对照,灭菌的EM制剂和不施用EM的对照包括相同的处理。在2005年春季和秋季以及2006年春季确定了每年的作物产量以及土壤微生物学参数,包括土壤呼吸,微生物生物量(SIR,CFE),脱氢酶活性和微生物群落结构(RISA,CLSU)。在实验室培养实验中,纤维素降解。测定添加的底物的N矿化潜力和N矿化。对于任何研究的参数,单独作为喷涂剂的EMA应用(处理(i))与未处理的对照(未经EM应用的处理)均无显着差异。如果在EMA((ii)和(iii))的基础上添加Bokashi,则与未经处理的作物产量和土壤微生物参数对照存在显着差异。但是,这些差异在整个参数和采样时间中并不一致。与无菌对照治疗相比,活体EM治疗在任何参数上均无差异。这表明观察到的微小影响不是由EM微生物引起的,而是由来自博卡西的营养输入引起的。与处理相比,采样时间对土壤微生物量,土壤呼吸和微生物群落结构的影响更大。我们从结果得出结论,在中欧温带气候条件下,“有效微生物”在此田间试验中应用4年后并未提高产量和土壤质量

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号