...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Physics-based tests to identify the accuracy of solar wind ion measurements: A case study with the Wind Faraday Cups
【24h】

Physics-based tests to identify the accuracy of solar wind ion measurements: A case study with the Wind Faraday Cups

机译:基于物理测试来识别的准确性太阳风离子测量:一个案例研究风法拉第杯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present techniques for comparing measurements of velocity, temperature, and density with constraints imposed by the plasma physics of magnetized bi-Maxwellian ions. Deviations from these physics-based constraints are interpreted as arising from measurement errors. Two million ion spectra from the Solar Wind Experiment Faraday Cup instruments on the Wind spacecraft are used as a case study. The accuracy of velocity measurements is determined by the fact that differential flow between hydrogen and helium should be aligned with the ambient magnetic field. Modeling the breakdown of field alignment suggests velocity uncertainties are less than 0.16% in magnitude and 3° in direction. Temperature uncertainty is found by examining the distribution of observed temperature anisotropies in high-beta solar wind intervals where the firehose, mirror, and cyclotron microinstabilities should drive the distribution to isotropy. The presence of a finite anisotropy at high beta suggests overall temperature uncertainties of 8%. Hydrogen and helium number densities are compared with the electron density inferred from observations of the local electron plasma frequency as a function of solar wind speed and year. We find that after accounting for the contribution of minor ions, the results are consistent with a systematic offset between the two instruments of 3–4%. The temperature and density methods are sensitive to non-Maxwellian features such as heat flux and proton beams and as a result are more suited to slow solar wind where these features are rare. These procedures are of general use in identifying the accuracy of observations from any solar wind ion instrument.
机译:我们提出的技术比较测量速度、温度和密度等离子体物理的限制磁化bi-Maxwellian离子。这些基于物理限制解释引起的测量误差。从太阳风离子光谱实验法拉第杯仪器风飞船作为一个案例研究。速度测量是由事实所决定的氢和之间的差流氦应该与环境保持一致磁场。对齐显示速度的不确定性不到0.16%的大小和3°方向。通过检查发现温度不确定性分布的观测温度各向异性在高贝塔太阳风的间隔消防带,镜子和回旋微观不稳定性应该驱动分布各向同性。在高β表明整体温度8%的不确定性。密度与电子密度进行比较推断出从观察当地的电子太阳风等离子体频率的函数速度和年。的贡献较小的离子,结果与系统之间的偏移量一致两种乐器的3 - 4%。密度对non-Maxwellian方法敏感热通量和质子束流等特性因此更适合缓慢的太阳风这些特性是罕见的。一般用于识别的准确性吗从任何太阳风离子仪器观测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号