...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied radiation and isotopes: including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine >Determination of self-absorption corrections for gamma analysis of environmental samples: comparing gamma-absorption curves and spiked matrix-matched samples.
【24h】

Determination of self-absorption corrections for gamma analysis of environmental samples: comparing gamma-absorption curves and spiked matrix-matched samples.

机译:确定环境样品的伽玛分析的自吸收校正值:比较伽玛吸收曲线和加标的基质匹配样品。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Accurate determination of the massic activity of gamma-emitting radionuclides in environmental samples, particularly sediments and soils, cannot be achieved without taking into account sample self-absorption. The extent of self-absorption in the sample will depend on a number of factors including sample composition, density, sample size and gamma-ray energy. The preferred method for correcting for this effect is to use spiked or natural matrix reference materials that match each sample type to be analysed. However, for laboratories that must measure a wide variety of sample matrices this method is too costly and time-consuming. Another technique commonly used is to make direct gamma-ray transmission measurements for each sample. This method, while more practical, still requires a minimum of three measurements to be made for each sample analysed. A more convenient method is to prepare sets of gamma-absorption curves. This approach involves making a series of direct transmission measurements for samples of varying densities but similar type. Sets of matching samples, both spiked and unspiked, were prepared and density correction factors determined using the direct transmission method and the spiked sample approach. It was found that, for soil and sediment samples, these two methods typically differed by 5-9% for higher energy gamma rays and by 12-15% for the 59.54keV (241)Am peak. Gamma-absorption curves were also derived and, for the admittedly limited dataset, 95% confidence intervals of +/-7% for the curve generated using the spiked samples method were obtained.
机译:如果不考虑样品的自吸收性,就无法准确确定环境样品(尤其是沉积物和土壤)中发射伽马射线的放射性核素的质量活性。样品中的自吸收程度将取决于许多因素,包括样品组成,密度,样品大小和伽马射线能量。校正此影响的首选方法是使用与要分析的每种样品类型匹配的加标或天然基质参考物质。但是,对于必须测量各种样品矩阵的实验室,此方法过于昂贵且耗时。常用的另一种技术是对每个样本进行直接的伽马射线透射测量。这种方法虽然更实用,但仍然需要对每个被分析的样品进行至少三个测量。一种更方便的方法是准备一组伽玛吸收曲线。这种方法涉及对密度不同但类型相似的样品进行一系列直接透射测量。制备了加标和未加标的匹配样品组,并使用直接透射法和加标样品方法确定了密度校正因子。结果发现,对于土壤和沉积物样品,这两种方法通常对于高能伽马射线相差5-9%,对于59.54keV(241)Am峰相差12-15%。还得出了伽马吸收曲线,对于公认的有限数据集,对于使用加标样品方法生成的曲线,获得了+/- 7%的95%置信区间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号