【24h】

Response to Re: Putting vital stains in context

机译:在环境中应对Re:把重要的污渍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been considerable discussion in recent times about the origins of solution-induced corneal staining (SICS) and I welcome this opportunity to further clarify some points raised in my paper1 in relation to certain issues highlighted by Drs Papas and Jones.2 Part of the difficulty in understanding these phenomena relates to the imprecise terminology used. For example, Drs Papas and Jones state '. . . SICS can be observed without the instillation of fluorescein.' This statement is self-contradictory because it is impossible to observe staining (SICS) in the absence of a stain (fluorescein). Presumably, Drs Papas and Jones are referring to a different and possibly associated phenomenon of altered reflectance of the superficial epithelium, observed in white light, following instillation into the eye of certain contact lens multipurpose solutions (MPS).
机译:最近已经有相当多的讨论*关于solution-induced的起源角膜染色(中心)和我欢迎机会进一步澄清一些点在我paper1某些问题突出了Drs爸爸和Jones.2的一部分很难理解这些现象涉及到使用不精确的术语。例子,Drs爸爸和琼斯状态”。。。可以观察到的滴注法荧光素”。自相矛盾的,因为它是不可能的观察染色(中心)在缺乏污渍(荧光素)。指的是不同,可能吗改变反射的现象有关表面的上皮细胞,观察到白色光,之后慢慢灌输的眼睛某些隐形眼镜多功能解决方案(国会议员)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号