首页> 外文期刊>Applied turfgrass science >Monitoring and Managing Putting Green Firmness on Golf Courses
【24h】

Monitoring and Managing Putting Green Firmness on Golf Courses

机译:监测和管理高尔夫球场的果岭硬度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since many golf course superintendents today are maintaining putting greens as dry as possible, it is critical to understand the relationship between firmness and soil volumetric water content (VWC) of putting greens. A series of firmness studies wereconducted to meet three objectives. For the first objective, to evaluate methodology using the Clegg Impact Soil Tester (CIST), it was determined that one drop of the 2.25-kg hammer was the preferred method to measure green firmness when using a CIST. For the second objective, to compare the 2.25-kg CIST and TruFirm devices, it was determined that a significant, inverse relationship (R~2 = 0.75, P < 0.001) existed between the devices. Therefore, both devices were useful tools in measuring green firmness. For the third objective, to better describe the relationship between firmness and VWC of putting greens, over 2000 samples from 53 golf courses were analyzed and it was determined that a significant inverse linear relationship existed between firmnessand VWC. However, the R~2 values for the relationship had a broad range (0.19 to 0.70), which indicated that there was significant variability associated with these estimates. This variability may be due, in part, to differences in sampling depth between the CIST and VWC probes. More likely sources of this variability were factors such as turf variety, verdure, thatch, mat, soil texture, and soil bulk density which impacted putting green firmness in addition to VWC.
机译:由于当今许多高尔夫球场管理者都在保持果岭尽可能干燥,因此了解果岭的硬度与土壤容积水含量(VWC)之间的关系至关重要。进行了一系列的牢固性研究,以实现三个目标。对于第一个目标,要评估使用Clegg冲击土壤测试仪(CIST)的方法,确定使用CIST测量2.2千克重的锤子是测量绿色硬度的首选方法。为了第二个目标,为了比较2.25千克CIST和TruFirm设备,确定设备之间存在显着的反比关系(R〜2 = 0.75,P <0.001)。因此,这两种设备都是测量绿色硬度的有用工具。为了实现第三个目标,为了更好地描述果岭硬度与果岭硬度之间的关系,分析了53个高尔夫球场的2000多个样品,并确定了硬度与果岭硬度之间存在显着的反线性关系。但是,该关系的R〜2值范围很广(0.19至0.70),这表明与这些估计值相关的变化很大。这种变化可能部分是由于CIST和VWC探针之间的采样深度不同。这种可变性的更可能来源是诸如草皮品种,鲜绿,茅草,垫子,土壤质地和土壤容重等因素,这些因素不仅影响VWC,还影响果岭的坚实度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号