...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy >Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts considering carbon emissions and governmental policy making
【24h】

Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts considering carbon emissions and governmental policy making

机译:供应链协调与收入分成考虑碳排放和合同政府制定政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Considering the opening up of carbon emission trading market, this article investigates the government's role in allocating the appropriate emission quota to maximize social members' (including enterprises and customers) utilities and analyzes how the emission-dependent enterprise improves revenues of both itself and the whole system through supply chain collaboration. Within this, a two-echelon supply chain consisting of one emission-dependent manufacturer and one retailer is discussed. Taking revenue-sharing contract into account and combining practical situations with Stackelberg game method, decision-makings of traditional supply chain (T-SC) without carbon emission limits and carbon-emission-considering supply chain (C-SC) are examined, respectively, along with the determination of the optimal range of revenue-sharing ratio. Furthermore, government's policy making in distributing the optimal emission quota is studied as well as supply chain members' efforts on fulfilling the revenue-sharing contract to accomplish Pareto improvements of social members' utilities. It is proved that profits of both manufacturer and retailer increase with the growth of the emission quota, proper governmental regulations not only help to achieve balance among social members but also improve overall utilities, and a reasonable revenue-sharing contract is essential to raise supply chain members' profits even under low-carbon conditions. (c) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 35: 479-488, 2016
机译:考虑碳排放的开放交易市场,本文调查了政府在分配适当的作用排放配额来最大化社会成员的(包括企业和客户)实用工具并分析emission-dependent如何企业本身和提高收入整个系统通过供应链协作。emission-dependent链组成的讨论了制造商和一个零售商。考虑到收入共享合同和结合实际情况和Stackelberg传统的游戏方法,作出决定供应链(T-SC)没有碳排放限制和carbon-emission-considering供应链(C-SC)检查,分别确定的最佳范围收入分成比例。在分配的最优决策研究了排放配额以及供应链成员的努力实现的收入共享契约来实现帕累托改善社会成员的公共事业。证明了制造商和利润零售商增加排放的增长不仅配额,适当的政府法规帮助社会成员之间达到平衡也提高整体实用工具,和一个合理的收入共享契约提高至关重要即使在供应链成员的利润低碳的条件。化学工程师学会环境掠夺,35:479-488, 2016

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号