...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells
【24h】

Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cells

机译:锂离子电池不同冷却方式的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Choosing a proper cooling method for a lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery pack for electric drive vehicles (EDVs) and making an optimal cooling control strategy to keep the temperature at a optimal range of 15 degrees C to 35 degrees C is essential to increasing safety, extending the pack service life, and reducing costs. When choosing a cooling method and developing strategies, trade-offs need to be made among many facets such as costs, complexity, weight, cooling effects, temperature uniformity, and parasitic power. This paper considers four cell-cooling methods: air cooling, direct liquid cooling, indirect liquid cooling, and fin cooling. To evaluate their effectiveness, these methods are assessed using a typical large capacity Li-ion pouch cell designed for EDVs from the perspective of coolant parasitic power consumption, maximum temperature rise, temperature difference in a cell, and additional weight used for the cooling system. We use a state-of-the-art Li-ion battery electro-chemical thermal model. The results show that under our assumption an air-cooling system needs 2 to 3 more energy than other methods to keep the same average temperature; an indirect liquid cooling system has the lowest maximum temperature rise; and a fin cooling system adds about 40% extra weight of cell, which weighs most, when the four kinds cooling methods have the same volume. Indirect liquid cooling is a more practical form than direct liquid cooling though it has slightly lower cooling performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:为电动汽车(EDV)的锂离子(Li-ion)电池组选择合适的冷却方法,并制定最佳的冷却控制策略,以将温度保持在15摄氏度至35摄氏度的最佳范围内,对于提高安全性,延长包装使用寿命并降低成本。在选择冷却方法和制定策略时,需要在许多方面进行权衡,例如成本,复杂性,重量,冷却效果,温度均匀性和寄生功率。本文考虑了四种电池冷却方法:空气冷却,直接液体冷却,间接液体冷却和散热片冷却。为了评估其有效性,从冷却剂寄生功率消耗,最大温升,电池中的温差以及冷却系统使用的额外重量的角度出发,使用为EDV设计的典型大容量锂离子袋式电池对这些方法进行评估。我们使用最先进的锂离子电池电化学热模型。结果表明,在我们的假设下,为了保持相同的平均温度,空气冷却系统比其他方法需要多2至3的能量。间接液体冷却系统的最高温度升高最低;当四种冷却方法具有相同的体积时,翅片冷却系统将增加电池重量约40%,这是最重的。间接液体冷却比直接液体冷却更为实用,尽管其冷却性能略低。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号