首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >A comparative study on the performance of HFO-1234yf and HFC-134a as an alternative in automotive air conditioning systems
【24h】

A comparative study on the performance of HFO-1234yf and HFC-134a as an alternative in automotive air conditioning systems

机译:HFO-1234yf和HFC-134a在汽车空调系统中的替代性能比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this study, an automotive air conditioning system is simulated by considering HFO-1234yf (2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene) as the drop-in replacement of HFC-134a. The simulated air conditioning system consists of a multi-louvered fin and flat-plate type evaporator, a wobble-plate type compressor, a mini channel parallel-flow type condenser and a thermostatic expansion valve. The thermodynamic properties of the refrigerants are extracted from the REFPROP 8.0 software, and a computer program is simulated for the thermodynamic analysis. Two different conditions have been considered in this program for the cycle analysis: for the first state, the cooling capacity is taken as constant, and for the second state the refrigerant mass flow rate is considered fixed. The performance characteristics of system including COP and cooling capacity have been studied with changing different parameters. The results show that the refrigerant-side overall heat transfer coefficient of HFO-1234yf is 18-21% lower than that of HFC-134a, and the pressure drop is 24% and 20% smaller than HFC-134a during condensing and evaporating processes, respectively. Also, in a constant cooling capacity, the COP of HFO-1234yf is lower than HFC-134a by 1.3-5%, and in the second case the COP of HFO-1234yf is about 18% higher than that of HFC-134a. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,通过考虑将HFO-1234yf(2,3,3,3-四氟丙烯)替代为HFC-134a来模拟汽车空调系统。模拟空调系统由多片百叶窗和平板式蒸发器,摆盘式压缩机,小通道平行流式冷凝器和恒温膨胀阀组成。从REFPROP 8.0软件中提取了制冷剂的热力学性质,并模拟了计算机程序进行热力学分析。在该程序中已考虑了两种不同的条件进行循环分析:对于第一种状态,制冷量为常数,对于第二种状态,制冷剂质量流量被视为固定。通过改变不同的参数,研究了系统的性能特征,包括COP和冷却能力。结果表明,在冷凝和蒸发过程中,HFO-1234yf的制冷剂侧总传热系数比HFC-134a低18-21%,压降比HFC-134a小24%和20%,分别。同样,在恒定的冷却能力下,HFO-1234yf的COP比HFC-134a低1.3-5%,在第二种情况下,HFO-1234yf的COP比HFC-134a高约18%。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号