首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Biomechanical analysis of peak and cumulative spinal loads during simulated patient-handling activities: A substudy of a randomized controlled trial to prevent lift and transfer injury of health care workers
【24h】

Biomechanical analysis of peak and cumulative spinal loads during simulated patient-handling activities: A substudy of a randomized controlled trial to prevent lift and transfer injury of health care workers

机译:在模拟的患者处理活动中峰值和累积脊柱负荷的生物力学分析:一项随机对照试验的子研究,以防止医护人员抬举和转移受伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Back injuries are a serious problem for nursing personnel who perform frequent patient-handling activities. Common prevention strategies include body mechanics education, technique training, and ergonomic interventions such as the introduction of assistive equipment. This investigation assessed and compared the effectiveness of two patient-handling approaches to reducing injury risk. One strategy involved using improved patient-handling technique with existing equipment, and the other approach aimed at eliminating manual patient handling through the use of additional mechanical and other assistive equipment. Both intervention arms received training in back care, patient assessment, and use of the equipment available on their particular wards. An analysis of compliance with interventions and the effects of patient-handling methods on both peak and cumulative spinal compression and shear during various tasks was conducted. Results showed greater compliance with interventions that incorporated new assistive patient-handling equipment, as opposed to those consisting of education and technique training alone. In several tasks, subjects who were untrained or non-compliant with interventions experienced significantly higher peak spinal loading. However, patient-handling tasks conducted with the aid of assistive equipment took substantially longer than those performed manually. This, along with variations in techniques, led to increases in cumulative spinal loading with the use of patient-handling equipment on some tasks. Thus, the use of mechanical assistive devices may not always be the best approach to reducing back injuries in all situations. No single intervention can be recommended; instead all patient-handling tasks should be examined separately to determine which methods maximize reductions in both peak and cumulative lumbar forces during a manoeuver.
机译:对于经常进行患者处理活动的护理人员来说,背部受伤是一个严重的问题。常见的预防策略包括人体力学教育,技术培训以及符合人体工程学的干预措施,例如引入辅助设备。这项研究评估并比较了两种减少患者受伤风险的方法的有效性。一种策略涉及在现有设备上使用改进的患者处理技术,另一种方法旨在通过使用附加的机械和其他辅助设备来消除手动的患者处理。两个干预部门都接受了有关背部护理,患者评估和使用特定病房可用设备的培训。进行了对干预措施的依从性以及患者处理方法对各种任务期间的峰值和累积脊柱压缩和剪切的影响的分析。结果表明,与仅由教育和技术培训组成的干预措施相比,采用新辅助患者处理设备的干预措施的依从性更高。在一些任务中,未经训练或不遵从干预措施的受试者的脊柱负荷峰值明显更高。但是,借助辅助设备执行的患者处理任务要比人工执行的任务花费更长的时间。这以及技术的变化,导致在某些任务上使用患者处理设备增加了脊柱累积负荷。因此,在所有情况下,使用机械辅助设备可能并不总是减少背部受伤的最佳方法。不能推荐任何干预措施;取而代之的是,应对所有患者处理任务进行单独检查,以确定在操作过程中哪种方法可以最大程度地减少峰值腰部力和累计腰部力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号