...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Should electric fans be used during a heat wave?
【24h】

Should electric fans be used during a heat wave?

机译:在热浪中应该使用电风扇吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Heat waves continue to claim lives, with the elderly and poor at greatest risk. A simple and cost-effective intervention is an electric fan, but public health agencies warn against their use despite no evidence refuting their efficacy in heat waves. A conceptual human heat balance model can be used to estimate the evaporative requirement for heat balance, the potential for evaporative heat loss from the skin, and the predicted sweat rate, with and without an electrical fan during heat wave conditions. Using criteria defined by the literature, it is clear that fans increase the predicted critical environmental limits for both the physiological compensation of endogenous/exogenous heat, and the onset of cardiovascular strain by an air temperature of 3-4 degrees C, irrespective of relative humidity (RH) for the young and elderly. Even above these critical limits, fans would apparently still provide marginal benefits at air temperatures as high as 51.1 degrees C at 10%RH for young adults and 48.1 degrees C at 10%RH for the elderly. Previous concerns that dehydration would be exacerbated with fan use do not seem likely, except under very hot (>40 degrees C) and dry (<10%RH) conditions, when predicted sweat losses are only greater with fans by a minor amount (-20-30 mL/h). Relative to the peak outdoor environmental conditions reported during ten of the most severe heat waves in recent history, fan use would be advisable in all of these situations, even when reducing the predicted maximum sweat output for the elderly. The protective benefit of fans appears to be underestimated by current guidelines. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
机译:热浪继续夺走生命,老年人和穷人处于最大危险之中。一种简单且具有成本效益的干预措施是使用电风扇,但公共卫生机构警告他们不要使用电风扇,尽管没有证据反驳其在热浪中的功效。可以使用概念性的人体热平衡模型来估计在热浪条件下是否有电风扇的情况下,对热量平衡的蒸发需求,皮肤蒸发掉的热量损失的可能性以及预计的出汗率。使用文献中定义的标准,很明显,无论相对湿度如何,风扇都会提高预测的临界环境极限,以补偿内源/外源热量的生理补偿,以及由于3-4摄氏度的气温而引起的心血管劳损发作(RH)的年轻人和老年人。甚至超过这些临界极限,风扇显然仍会为年轻人提供10%RH的51.1摄氏度和老年人的10%RH的48.1摄氏度的边际收益。以前似乎不太可能担心因使用风扇而导致脱水加剧,除非在非常热(> 40摄氏度)和干燥(<10%RH)的条件下,当预计的汗水流失仅在风扇中仅占很小的比例时(- 20-30 mL / h)。相对于最近历史上最严重的十次热浪中报告的峰值室外环境条件,在所有这些情况下都建议使用风扇,即使减少老人的最大预期出汗量也是如此。当前的指南似乎低估了风扇的保护益处。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd和人体工程学学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号