首页> 外文期刊>Applied Geography >The spatial distribution of development in Europe and its underlying sustainability correlations
【24h】

The spatial distribution of development in Europe and its underlying sustainability correlations

机译:欧洲发展的空间分布及其潜在的可持续发展关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The majority of national governments now dedicate themselves to sustainable development as it aims to produce a long-term, positive relationship between civilization and life-supporting planetary resources. By doing so, societies have also embraced indicators as tools to provide comprehensive assessment of the current position, gauge improvement, and help set future development goals; however there remains no unanimous agreement regarding their theoretical foundation, design, nor use. The number of sustainability measures available for quantifying development is overwhelming to planners, scientists, and policymakers, thus clarification of interrelationships, redundancy, and spatial distributions is needed. First, this study reduced and described a set of 30 multi-metric sustainability indices across 36 European nations. A multivariate factor analysis identified five major dimensions (or axes) that conveyed over 80% of the total variation of the original 30 development measures. Second, spatial autoregressive analyses of childhood mortality, endangered species density, and population growth rate revealed statistical correlations with one or more of the five development factors. The five axes of sustainable development are expressions of: prosperity, equality, and governance; quality of life; ecosystem integrity; environmentally efficient happiness; and environmental management. Of these, Factor 1 (prosperity, equality, and governance) explained more than one-third of the total variance, and positively clustered in northwest Europe and negatively in southeast Europe. Results suggest that a few key indicators could be used when evaluating a country's overall development status during continental and global scale sustainability assessments. Lastly, the findings reveal an overall underrepresentation of ecological (biosphere) wellbeing within current measures of sustainable development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:现在,大多数国家政府致力于可持续发展,因为它旨在在文明与支持生命的行星资源之间建立长期的积极关系。通过这样做,社会也将指标作为工具来提供对当前状况的全面评估,衡量改进并帮助设定未来的发展目标;但是,关于它们的理论基础,设计或用途,尚未达成一致意见。规划人员,科学家和政策制定者不计其数的可用于量化发展的可持续性措施,因此需要澄清相互关系,冗余度和空间分布。首先,这项研究减少并描述了36个欧洲国家的30种多指标可持续性指数。多元因素分析确定了五个主要维度(或轴),这些主要维度(或轴)传达了最初30项开发指标的总变化的80%以上。其次,对儿童死亡率,濒危物种密度和种群增长率的空间自回归分析显示出与五个发展因素中的一个或多个具有统计相关性。可持续发展的五个轴心是:繁荣,平等和治理;生活质量;生态系统完整性;环保快乐;和环境管理。在这些因素中,因素1(繁荣,平等和治理)解释了总差异的三分之一以上,并且在西北欧呈正向聚集,在东南欧呈负向聚集。结果表明,在大陆和全球范围的可持续性评估过程中评估一个国家的总体发展状况时,可以使用一些关键指标。最后,调查结果表明,在当前的可持续发展措施范围内,生态(生物圈)福祉的总体代表性不足。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号