首页> 外文期刊>Animal >Grassland systems of red meat production: integration between biodiversity, plant nutrient utilisation, greenhouse gas emissions and meat nutritional quality.
【24h】

Grassland systems of red meat production: integration between biodiversity, plant nutrient utilisation, greenhouse gas emissions and meat nutritional quality.

机译:草原红肉生产系统:生物多样性,植物养分利用,温室气体排放与肉类营养质量之间的整合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Government policies relating to red meat production take account of the carbon footprint, environmental impact, and contributions to human health and nutrition, biodiversity and food security. This paper reviews the impact of grazing on these parameters and their interactions, identifying those practices that best meet governments' strategic goals. The recent focus of research on livestock grazing and biodiversity has been on reducing grazing intensity on hill and upland areas. Although this produces rapid increases in sward height and herbage mass, changes in structural diversity and plant species are slower, with no appreciable short-term increases in biodiversity so that environmental policies that simply involve reductions in numbers of livestock may not result in increased biodiversity. Furthermore, upland areas rely heavily on nutrient inputs to pastures so that withdrawal of these inputs can threaten food security. Differences in grazing patterns among breeds increase our ability to manage biodiversity if they are matched appropriately to different conservation grazing goals. Lowland grassland systems differ from upland pastures in that additional nutrients in the form of organic and inorganic fertilisers are more frequently applied to lowland pastures. Appropriate management of these nutrient applications is required, to reduce the associated environmental impact. New slurry-spreading techniques and technologies (e.g. the trailing shoe) help reduce nutrient losses but high nitrogen losses from urine deposition remain a key issue for lowland grassland systems. Nitrification inhibitors have the greatest potential to successfully tackle this problem. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are lower from indoor-based systems that use concentrates to shorten finishing periods. The challenge is to achieve the same level of performance from grass-based systems. Research has shown potential solutions through the use of forages containing condensed tannins or establishing swards with a high proportion of clover and high-sugar grasses. Relative to feeding conserved forage or concentrates, grazing fresh grass not only reduces GHG emissions but also enhances the fatty acid composition of meat in terms of consumer health. It is possible to influence biodiversity, nutrient utilisation, GHG emissions and the nutritional quality of meat in grass-based systems, but each of these parameters is intrinsically linked and should not be considered in isolation. Interactions between these parameters must be considered carefully when policies are being developed, in order to ensure that strategies designed to achieve positive gains in one category do not lead to a negative impact in another. Some win-win outcomes are identified.
机译:与红肉生产有关的政府政策考虑了碳足迹,环境影响以及对人类健康和营养,生物多样性和粮食安全的贡献。本文回顾了放牧对这些参数及其相互作用的影响,确定了最能满足政府战略目标的做法。最近有关放牧和生物多样性的研究重点是减少丘陵和高地地区的放牧强度。尽管这会导致草皮高度和草料质量迅速增加,但结构多样性和植物物种的变化变慢,生物多样性不会出现明显的短期增加,因此仅涉及减少牲畜数量的环境政策可能不会导致生物多样性增加。此外,高地地区严重依赖牧草的养分投入,因此撤回这些投入可能威胁粮食安全。如果品种与不同的保护性放牧目标适当匹配,那么不同品种之间的放牧模式差异将增强我们管理生物多样性的能力。低地草原系统与高地牧场的不同之处在于,有机和无机肥料形式的其他养分更多地应用于低地牧场。需要适当管理这些养分施用,以减少相关的环境影响。新的撒泥技术和新技术(例如拖尾靴)有助于减少养分流失,但尿液沉降造成的高氮流失仍然是低地草原系统的关键问题。硝化抑制剂具有成功解决该问题的最大潜力。使用浓缩物来缩短精加工时间的室内系统的温室气体排放量更低。挑战是要实现基于草的系统相同水平的性能。研究表明,通过使用含有缩合单宁的草料或使用三叶草和高糖草比例高的草皮,可以找到潜在的解决方案。相对于饲喂保存的草料或精料,放牧鲜草不仅减少了温室气体的排放,而且从消费者的健康角度出发,还提高了肉类的脂肪酸组成。在基于草的系统中,可能影响生物多样性,养分利用,GHG排放和肉的营养质量,但这些参数中的每一个都是内在联系的,不应单独考虑。在制定政策时,必须仔细考虑这些参数之间的相互作用,以确保旨在在一种类别中取得积极收益的战略不会对另一种类别产生负面影响。确定了一些双赢的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号