首页> 外文期刊>Angiology: the Journal of Vascular Diseases >Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention
【24h】

Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention

机译:经radi动脉入路行冠状动脉搭桥术的安全性和可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The transradial approach (TRA) is commonly applied for coronary catheterization. However, there are few reports on the safety and feasibility of transradial catheterization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We retrospectively evaluated 124 consecutive patients who underwent graft angiography and intervention via the transradial (TRA group, n = 68) or transfemoral approach (TFA group, n = 56). The baseline clinical characteristics between the 2 groups were similar except for prior myocardial infarction. No significant difference (P >.05)was observed in procedure time, the success rate of puncture, angiography, and intervention procedure between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events during hospitalization. However, the vascular access site complications were significantly lower (P =.021) and the duration of hospitalization was shorter (P =.007) in the TRA group. The TRA for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention was safe and feasible.
机译:radi动脉入路(TRA)通常用于冠状动脉导管插入术。但是,很少有关于在进行冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的患者中进行经radi动脉导管插入术的安全性和可行性的报道。我们回顾性评估了124例连续接受经the动脉血管造影(TRA组,n = 68)或经股动脉入路(TFA组,n = 56)的患者。除先前的心肌梗塞外,两组之间的基线临床特征相似。两组的手术时间,穿刺,血管造影和介入手术的成功率均无显着性差异(P> .05)。住院期间主要不良心脏和脑血管事件无显着差异。然而,TRA组的血管通路部位并发症显着降低(P = .021),住院时间较短(P = .007)。 TRA用于冠状动脉搭桥血管造影和介入治疗是安全可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号